User talk:Syamsu
(→Edit warring) |
(→Edit warring) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
: shut up you stupid emotionless robot who rejects subjectivity.--[[User:Syamsu|Syamsu]] ([[User talk:Syamsu|talk]]) 15:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC) | : shut up you stupid emotionless robot who rejects subjectivity.--[[User:Syamsu|Syamsu]] ([[User talk:Syamsu|talk]]) 15:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | ===Use the Talk Page=== | ||
| + | You clearly don't deserve unabridged access to the article itself--[[User:Mikal|<span style="color:#006600">'''Mikal'''</span>]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Mikal|<span style="color:#CC0000">Harass</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Mikal|<span style="color:#000099">Follow</span>]]</sup> 16:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:26, 1 October 2012
We're in a sorry state if it takes this long to greet new users. Harmonic wisest Phantom! 22:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Significant and controversial amendments to articles such as Free will need to be discussed first. Jack Hughes (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Contents |
Ysosp¬!
Uoy ear a Ysosp¬! Harmonic wisest Phantom! 21:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Please sign your posts with four tildes or the signature button.
Please sign your posts with four tildes or the signature button.Please sign your posts with four tildes or the signature button.Please sign your posts with four tildes or the signature button.Please sign your posts with four tildes or the signature button.Please sign your posts with four tildes or the signature button.Please sign your posts with four tildes or the signature button.Please sign your posts with four tildes or the signature button.Please sign your posts with four tildes or the signature button.Please sign your posts with four tildes or the signature button.TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Denying...
Where is anybody denying the role of subjectivity in decision making? — Unsigned, by: ORavenhurst / talkDo You Believe That? 14:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- like I said, I know dozens of your sort. Be very, very, very specific in criticizing the entry I made. --Syamsu (talk) 14:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- So, you refuse to answer the question then? Thanks for clearing that up. — Unsigned, by: ORavenhurst / talkDo You Believe That? 14:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- It's a bullshit question intended to divert attention away from your rejection of subjectivity as a valid way of reaching a conclusion.--Syamsu (talk) 14:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- My question is, WHEN DID I REJECT SUBJECTIVITY you fucking back-birth. — Unsigned, by: ORavenhurst / talkDo You Believe That? 14:57, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- When you deleted my entry obviously, which validated subjectivity.--Syamsu (talk) 14:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- My question is, WHEN DID I REJECT SUBJECTIVITY you fucking back-birth. — Unsigned, by: ORavenhurst / talkDo You Believe That? 14:57, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- It's a bullshit question intended to divert attention away from your rejection of subjectivity as a valid way of reaching a conclusion.--Syamsu (talk) 14:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- So, you refuse to answer the question then? Thanks for clearing that up. — Unsigned, by: ORavenhurst / talkDo You Believe That? 14:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Edit warring
Please desist with the edit warring. Make your case on the article talk page.
ГенгисRationalWiki GOLD member
15:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- shut up you stupid emotionless robot who rejects subjectivity.--Syamsu (talk) 15:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Use the Talk Page
You clearly don't deserve unabridged access to the article itself--Mikal Harass Follow 16:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)