User talk:Weaseloid
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- ARCHIVES - ![]()
![]()
![]()
1 (mostly boring)
2 (mostly arguments)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
3 (mostly insults) ![]()
![]()
4 (mostly tedious)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
thank you
thank you--"Shut up, Brx." 00:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I smite you with drinking smilies.
steriletalk 00:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
I smite you back with . . . some guy jerking off on a pirate. ![]()
Wëäŝëïöïď
Methinks it is a Weasel 00:35, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
{{fun}}
Why did you revert this template?--Mr. B (talk) 21:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- It didn't link to anything. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď
Methinks it is a Weasel 23:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- I've made redirect Fun:Encyclopædia Dramatica.--Mr. B (talk) 10:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Mod business
RationalWiki:All things in moderation#MC's Wiki and Human -- Nx / talk 05:37, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
How do you go about feeding a little weasel?
With liquor and hate. ![]()
23:07, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- More like this. Wëäŝëïöïď
Methinks it is a Weasel 18:59, 24 November 2011 (UTC) _______________________^
"oriental woo"
I'm curious... in the US academic system we were strongly discouraged from using the term "oriental" to describe anything, as it is (likes most things) a "white oppressor word" to describe an area that is so large, the cultures share nothing with eachother, not even a "racial" (so to speak) heritage. In other words, the term was as offensive as "indian" for our native people. Any thoughts? --
GodotSome would use a tautology to describe it ("The way things are done around here is the wa 17:06, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- I did have a quick look at WP:Orient when deciding what to call the category, & I'm aware that it's sometimes considered offensive (probably more in the US than the UK). I only really use the word to refer to historical cultures/traditions etc. - I wouldn't usually describe a person as "oriental" or refer to East Asia as "the Orient". If you've got a better idea for what to call the category, let me know, but I still think it's a pretty good fit. Re "cultures share nothing with each other", the fact is that ancient/medieval Chinese colonialism & trade spread Chinese cultural influence a long way, so many aspects of Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese cultures (for example) are at least partially adapted from Chinese influence. I think everything I've put in that category for now originates from either China or Japan. However, there is the question of whether Indian woo (e.g. yoga, chakras, ayurvedic medicine), which appeal to a similar New Age audience in the west, can also be classed as "oriental woo" despite coming from rather different cultural origins than the Chinese & Japanese stuff. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐ
Methinks it is a Weasel 17:25, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
moderator
I pledge support to you in your moderator campaign. If we are both elected I hope to work productively with you. May an era of peace bless us all. AceVote Ace for Mod! 21:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Ace. That gladdens this Weasel's gnarly old heart. ωεαşεζόίď
Methinks it is a Weasel 21:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed because we say we will not go quietly into the night! It is our INDEPENDENCE DAY!. AceVote Ace for Mod! 21:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Those were the days...
....was just reading this with a feeling of sentimentally and nostalgia. AceVote Ace for Mod! 22:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, good times, for the most part. I'm curious about what interactions with CUR your comment here referred to? Wěǎšěǐǒǐď
Methinks it is a Weasel 23:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- I went and tracked him down on the Werelist and he was extremely rude, suggesting those on RW bullied him because they couldn't open their minds to his rational proposition regarding him being a wolf/cheetah thing. I was quite polite but he got very upset about...something and blocked all communications warning me that he could ban me from his little site. AceVote Ace for Mod! 23:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's our CUR for you. He did start his own wiki like he promised to, on Wikia or one of those kinda sites. AFAIK he was the sole editor of it; maybe still is for all I know. I got an email from CUR inviting me to it, but didn't see it till months afterwards as I don't really use the email address linked to my RW account for anything. Weaseloid
Methinks it is a Weasel 23:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's our CUR for you. He did start his own wiki like he promised to, on Wikia or one of those kinda sites. AFAIK he was the sole editor of it; maybe still is for all I know. I got an email from CUR inviting me to it, but didn't see it till months afterwards as I don't really use the email address linked to my RW account for anything. Weaseloid
- Ah, the good old days. Nowadays you'd just block someone like CUR for three months for being annoying. -- Nx / talk 23:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Calm Nx, Human isn't around today. No need to butt in a voice your displeasure. Why don't you set up a page in your user space where you can be nasty without intruding on others? AceVote Ace for Mod! 00:41, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- I went and tracked him down on the Werelist and he was extremely rude, suggesting those on RW bullied him because they couldn't open their minds to his rational proposition regarding him being a wolf/cheetah thing. I was quite polite but he got very upset about...something and blocked all communications warning me that he could ban me from his little site. AceVote Ace for Mod! 23:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
'Ship of Fools'
May you please restore the article so that I can improve it so that I can improve the wiki and hence help out around here and start pulling my weight. Idiot number 613432 (talk) 22:53, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- A couple of dozen words isn't an article. Please respond to my question on the "article"'s talk page. I really don't see any justification for why we should write about this topic, but if you can explain what it would contain as a proper article & how that would serve the site missions (see RationalWiki), then we can see above restoring or replacing it. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ
Methinks it is a Weasel 22:56, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Its funny I'm just trying to help out, i don't see what the problem is or why you're being so hostile. Idiot number 613432 (talk) 23:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not hostile, but the problem is that the page you created isn't needed or wanted. I've responded further at talk:Ship of Fools. Wēāŝēīōīď
Methinks it is a Weasel 23:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not hostile, but the problem is that the page you created isn't needed or wanted. I've responded further at talk:Ship of Fools. Wēāŝēīōīď
- Its funny I'm just trying to help out, i don't see what the problem is or why you're being so hostile. Idiot number 613432 (talk) 23:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Why did you delete my userpage?
Huh? Was this some kind of joke? Kate McCormick (talk) 22:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- No, the page was created by an anonymous IP user. Feel free to recreate it, but stay signed in to show that it's you creating the page. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ
Methinks it is a Weasel 22:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Why don't you just undelete it bro, what's wrong with using proxies? By the way, this "vandal bin" as you guys call it is annoying, I don't know if this is something you have just for new editors or what, but it's not very welcoming. I dunno, maybe it's the proxy I'm using, but if that's the case I just use a proxy for the anonymity ever since the time some asshole moderator on a forum just didn't like me and DoSed the IP I was using. Lets just say the principal and the IT guys at my school weren't very happy with me when they found out it was a guy from a forum I was posting on that sent the whole school's network crashing down. Kate McCormick (talk) 23:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- I think we'll leave it for you to undelete, since user's pages are their's to do with what they want. As for the Vandal Bin, it's a security measure against vandalism which IP editors are, by default, sorted into. It's a pain, I know, but it keeps an anonymous IP from using a computer program to vandalize us. Recklessly Noise Punk What's this button do? Uh oh.... 23:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- You guys sure are welcoming, "fuck off troll" says this guy named "Pi"? You guys sound just like the overly paranoid sysops at Conservapedia. Go kick rocks, no wonder people vandalize this place. Kate McCormick (talk) 00:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wahey! Just like Conservapedia! Drink! Rennie McGreet (talk) 12:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Nobody mentioned anonymous proxies, the quote was about an anonymous IP. We don't care if you use a proxy. However, we have had some problems with anonymous editors posting personal information about someone else who claimed to be a high school cheerleader, so when an unidentified editor creates a page using what appears to be a real name and gives some personal information we act to protect privacy.
Генгисevolving
12:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- You guys sure are welcoming, "fuck off troll" says this guy named "Pi"? You guys sound just like the overly paranoid sysops at Conservapedia. Go kick rocks, no wonder people vandalize this place. Kate McCormick (talk) 00:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- I think we'll leave it for you to undelete, since user's pages are their's to do with what they want. As for the Vandal Bin, it's a security measure against vandalism which IP editors are, by default, sorted into. It's a pain, I know, but it keeps an anonymous IP from using a computer program to vandalize us. Recklessly Noise Punk What's this button do? Uh oh.... 23:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Why don't you just undelete it bro, what's wrong with using proxies? By the way, this "vandal bin" as you guys call it is annoying, I don't know if this is something you have just for new editors or what, but it's not very welcoming. I dunno, maybe it's the proxy I'm using, but if that's the case I just use a proxy for the anonymity ever since the time some asshole moderator on a forum just didn't like me and DoSed the IP I was using. Lets just say the principal and the IT guys at my school weren't very happy with me when they found out it was a guy from a forum I was posting on that sent the whole school's network crashing down. Kate McCormick (talk) 23:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
I almost voted for you...
...for moderator. Pool closed on me. Shucks. Do you want to be Board Member?, 'cause I could totally make that happen. ~ Lumenos (talk) 05:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Lume, but I can't really commit to the Board stuff. Ŵêâŝêîôîď
Methinks it is a Weasel 11:06, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- I was thinking of perhaps voting for you at one time but then got drunk and forgot all about it. ;)
Генгисevolving
11:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- I was thinking of voting for you, but then I remembered that voting is meaningless so long as we're ruled by a corrupt two-party system.
Radioactive Misanthrope 11:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Well, judging by the preliminary results, third parties seem to be doing OK. --DamoHi 11:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- I was thinking of voting for you, but then I remembered that voting is meaningless so long as we're ruled by a corrupt two-party system.
- I was thinking of perhaps voting for you at one time but then got drunk and forgot all about it. ;)
Thanks
I appreciate the comment on the rights change. You'll be back soon enough... ħuman
03:26, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- Don't worry, Huw. I'm promoting him within the shadow organization. Respond that email, Weas. It's your time.

03:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks guys. I'm pretty happy with the election results. None of the people I didn't want as moderators got in. I agree with comments in your email Nutty. Not sure about the shadow organisation, though. Is it like Skull & Bones? Wėąṣėḷőįď
Methinks it is a Weasel 10:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- Fuck Nutty, "people" are watching. We'll skype about it later. AceModerator 07:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks guys. I'm pretty happy with the election results. None of the people I didn't want as moderators got in. I agree with comments in your email Nutty. Not sure about the shadow organisation, though. Is it like Skull & Bones? Wėąṣėḷőįď
Hungry weasels
How many could you feed, magic typing weasel. TyBother me 22:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Approximately 42. Doesn't say for how long . . . Ŵêâŝêîôîď
Methinks it is a Weasel 22:29, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'm guessing for one meal. TyBother me 22:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- 64. or 2 cats. I am not dying in my own home.
GodotGrow a vagina 22:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- {EC, reply to Ty} Nah. Ferrets, which are similar to weasels but much bigger, only eat about 80-100g of food a day (about 5% of their body weight). Most weasels would be less than half the weight of a ferret. 42 would only eat about a kilo or so between them in a day, by my reckoning. Wèàšèìòìď
Methinks it is a Weasel 22:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- {EC, reply to Ty} Nah. Ferrets, which are similar to weasels but much bigger, only eat about 80-100g of food a day (about 5% of their body weight). Most weasels would be less than half the weight of a ferret. 42 would only eat about a kilo or so between them in a day, by my reckoning. Wèàšèìòìď
- 64. or 2 cats. I am not dying in my own home.
- I'm guessing for one meal. TyBother me 22:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
the Asshole Atheist page
teh comment you removed (and i'm totally fine with you removing it of course) wasn't supposed to be armchair psychology, but bitchy sarcasm. ;-)
GodotGrow a vagina 03:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough I guess. I didn't feel like it really added anything, either way. Wëäŝëïöïď
Methinks it is a Weasel 07:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Did anyone specifically link to us, or has he been revealed to be so much of an asshole that people are actively googling him and finding us? Peter Monomorium antarcticum 08:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- He linked to us himself about a week ago. Not sure about any further links following this feminism/rape debacle. Wèàšèìòìď
Methinks it is a Weasel 08:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- We're fairly high on google (I can't tell if that's just inflated for me because I go here a lot) and he doesn't seem to have a WP page, so it's hard to tell. We'll see if it turns up on google alerts. Peter Monomorium antarcticum 08:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- He linked to us himself about a week ago. Not sure about any further links following this feminism/rape debacle. Wèàšèìòìď
altering user comments
Armondikov altered my comment with [1]. I reverted, requesting it be left as-is, there is reason for red links in that comment, it shows that a page name is being suggested, and it will, in the future, show whether or not the page was created or moved. I was again reverted by you. So, for my understanding of RationalWiki practice, will you please explain this thing to me? I understand that some users don't like red links on article pages, though I've certainly seen exceptions. But on a Talk page? What's the problem? To what extent will the mob allow users to edit the comments of other users? It can be a very slippery slope, some people tend to get pissed off about it. --Abd (talk) 18:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- Nobody altered your comments. Removing a redundant non-link is not the same thing. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď
Methinks it is a Weasel 19:46, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- The comment was altered, that's obvious, it was edited. The link distinguishes a pagename from text. The very point was that it's not an active page. Given that I was actually suggesting the creation of two different pages, this, then, makes the text less effective. It was not redundant, or did you not notice that the names were different? Suit yourself. If I find that I sufficiently give an eff, I'll ask about this.--Abd (talk) 19:57, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Geniocracy
Are the citation needed tags necessary? I'm taking all of this from the book. Should I provide page numbers? The book is less than 100 pages short. — Haamer (talk) 01:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
And the PDF book is linked to in the external links section, it's free. — Haamer (talk) 01:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think it should still be linked to where it's quoted, to make it clear. Either use the repeat references thing (see Help:References#Repeating references), or put a citation in where the book is first mentioned, stating that all quotes are from this. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐ
Methinks it is a Weasel 01:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The English did not invent the idea that Joseph of Arimethea brought the Grail to England. A French writer did.
I have amended the Holy Grail article accordingly.--WickerGuy (talk) 19:12, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- OK. Why are you telling me this? Wēāŝēīōīď
Methinks it is a Weasel 19:40, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- In an edit you made to Holy Grail circa 19:01, 12 May 2010 , you wrote
- "The cup was believed to have been preserved by Joseph of Arimathea, who later brought it to England (at least according to the English, who wrote most of this nonsense)."
- . . . [further comments relocated to Talk:Holy Grail] . . . --WickerGuy (talk) 00:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- So what? Two years later, I don't need a fucking memo when somebody wants to rewrite it. Nor do I want to be personally lectured on the subject. Go away. Wēāŝēīōīď
Methinks it is a Weasel 03:59, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- So what? Two years later, I don't need a fucking memo when somebody wants to rewrite it. Nor do I want to be personally lectured on the subject. Go away. Wēāŝēīōīď
I'm not trying to evade a community decision
My name is on the account creation for all those accounts. I could not defy a community decision with those accounts because everyone would know it was me as soon as I'd pop up. This was in case users like P-Foster and Ace McWicked decided to unilaterally strip me of my rights and block me, to ensure that I could protest their actions. And you know what? Users like P-Foster and Ace McWicked already have unilaterally blocked me and stripped me of my rights, and using sock accounts I had previously created helped me to get unblocked.
But now, thanks to the interference of you and Mikalos, my contingency plan has been compromised. You've brought unwarranted attention to my sock accounts, and the next time P-Foster, Ace McWicked, Nutty Roux, Archie Goodwin, and whoever I'm forgetting decide to unilaterally strip me of my rights and block me (which they've already done), they'll be conscious of my backup accounts and block and desysop those too. Thanks a lot.--"Shut up, Brx." 01:39, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- You brought attention to your accounts, by unblocking the other ones. If you hadn't they wouldn't now be listed, for example, on your rww page because everyone would have forgotten about them. Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 01:41, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps. But Weaseloid and Mikalos certainly exacerbated things.--"Shut up, Brx." 01:43, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- No, i stopped a suspect in a massive attack on the wiki from creating spare sysop level accounts, a sane rational thing to do; and beyond that, when did it become ok to just make accounts and grant them rights?--il'Dictator Mikal 01:44, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Other users have done the same. As long as it's just you, there's really no harm.--"Shut up, Brx." 01:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Citation needed, hmm? Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 01:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Other users have done the same. As long as it's just you, there's really no harm.--"Shut up, Brx." 01:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- No, i stopped a suspect in a massive attack on the wiki from creating spare sysop level accounts, a sane rational thing to do; and beyond that, when did it become ok to just make accounts and grant them rights?--il'Dictator Mikal 01:44, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps. But Weaseloid and Mikalos certainly exacerbated things.--"Shut up, Brx." 01:43, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
dos vacas
I see it as a common way of interpreting item three of our mission. As for Uncyclopedia, I don't see how it has any mission relevance.--"Shut up, Brx." 07:27, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Desert Island Discs
Wanker.
Генгисevolving
10:31, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- WTF? It was nominated for deletion for over two months and not linked from anything. Non-useful content gets deleted all the time. What am I being called a wanker for? Wẽãšẽĩõĩď
Methinks it is a Weasel 11:37, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
It is better known as strawman fallacy or strawman argument
But if there's some reason that we want to keep the laymen's terminology, I'd like a bit of an explanation, other than "don't do that" which was remarkably unhelpful, especially if I may want to do the same thing elsewhere. SkepticalRaptor®™ 23:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- "We" who? You've been here two weeks & want to arbitrarily rename a popular article that's stood here five years, without even looking for other people's opinions first. If you want to do the same thing elsewhere, think about not doing it. That's my advice. Weaseloid
Methinks it is a Weasel 00:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- That's what we call an Appeal to antiquity. Good to know. SkepticalRaptor®™ 01:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Again, who are you claiming to be talking on behalf of, or is this the majestic plural? ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ
Methinks it is a Weasel 01:28, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Again, who are you claiming to be talking on behalf of, or is this the majestic plural? ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ
- That's what we call an Appeal to antiquity. Good to know. SkepticalRaptor®™ 01:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm using a proxy, you idiot.
You can unblog the IP address before, takes me two seonds two get a new one. How's the weather over there? ★uːʤɱ libertarian 17:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Rainy. Wëäŝëïöïď
Methinks it is a Weasel 17:45, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
I hate to say it
But I'd rather have you than one of those other ones--"Shut up, Brx." 04:30, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- What Bricks means is that you've been nominated for moderator.
Acer Blue 04:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)