From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
You gotta spin it to win it


Icon media.svg
Stop the presses!
We want pictures
of Spider-Man!
Extra! Extra!

WikiLeaks is a wiki that hosts leaked confidential documents, while preserving the anonymity of its contributors and staff. It operates as a news site, reviewing and commenting on documents it puts up.

It has aroused the ire of many governments and businesses - the Pentagon is out to get editor in chief Julian Assange personally - and shown the populace what effect journalism is supposed to have.



WikiLeaks' stated aim was to expose the official corruption in repressive governments[1], but their door is open to almost any kind of leaked documents.

Wikileaks is developing an uncensorable Wikipedia for untraceable mass document leaking and analysis. Our primary interest is in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we also expect to be of assistance to people of all regions who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and corporations. We aim for maximum political impact. Our interface is identical to Wikipedia and usable by all types of people. We have received over 1.2 million documents so far from dissident communities and anonymous sources. We believe that transparency in government activities leads to reduced corruption, better government and stronger democracies. All governments can benefit from increased scrutiny by the world community, as well as their own people. We believe this scrutiny requires information. Historically that information has been costly - in terms of human life and human rights. But with technological advances - the internet, and cryptography - the risks of conveying important information can be lowered.

Assange formed his free-speech ideals running a free speech ISP, (still extant) in the 1990s.[2] He published a document in 2002, State and Terrorist Conspiracies,[3] setting out his aims in detail: to increase the friction in the mechanisms by which authoritarian governments conspire against their citizens, thus changing the lay of the land and forcing them to more open communication mechanisms. It's the inchoate hacker (as in cracker) free speech ideal of the 1980s developed into a coherent philosophy. Which is quite an achievement in itself.


The Editor In Chief is Australian computer hacker Julian Assange, who has long experience pissing off the thoroughly deserving. He has balls of titanium.[4]

He is remarkably disliked by many governments and newspaper journalists. Sarah Palin has called for him to be "hunted down" and Canadian Tom Flanagan has called for him to be executed.[5] Mike Huckabee has called for the execution of the individual who leaked the 250,000 US diplomatic cables.[6]

Notable leaks

Afghanistan War logs

On July 25th, 2010, Wikileaks released tens of thousands of classified military field reports in relation to the Afghanistan War. It provided the New York Times [11], The Guardian [12] and Der Spiegel [13] with over 90,000 classified military documents in what is being described as one of the biggest leaks in the history of the United States military [14]. The documents show that:

  • There have been hundreds of unreported civilian deaths and soldiers frequently fudge the numbers in their field reports in counting dead civilians as 'insurgents'.
  • The Taliban apparently use heat-seeking missiles against allied aircraft, something the US has glossed over. Possibly because the US sold the technology to them during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 80's. Oops.
  • The CIA pretty much runs their own paramilitary in Afghanistan, launching raids and ambushes, and even has the ability to call airstrikes. Letting the CIA have such free roam is, of course, a great idea, since they are so well known for respecting human rights. And the Afghanistan spy agency is essentially their bitch.
  • It basically confirms what we knew already, that the US gives millions of dollars to Pakistan only for that money to be funneled to insurgents killing American soldiers.

The New York Times says the military never really lied - just made misleading statements. However, saying aircraft have been brought down by conventional weapons when in fact they are using heat-seeking technology we sold them sounds an awful like an untrue statement - in other words, a lie, or crediting Afghan forces with victories when they really had nothing to do with it. The parallel to the leaking of the Pentagon Papers (a US Department of Defense study that pretty much proved four consecutive US administrations had made a habit of lying straight in the face of the American people about the Vietnam War) is evident.

The reports paint a clear picture of Afghanistan and the war. Despite almost a decade of war and billions of dollars spent on it, the insurgency is not dying down, and is in fact getting stronger. The Taliban have a network of spies, informers and double agents working against the Afghanistan government and NATO forces. The Afghanistan National Army and police force are in disarray, plagued by corruption and abuse. Many defect to the Taliban, while the ones who stick it out become reviled by Afghan citizens. In fact, the population now thinks the Taliban was better then what they have now. Large portions of the country are controlled by warlords who are above the law, and the government is hopelessly corrupt.

With poverty, corruption on every level, citizens under threat of constant violence, untrained soldiers and police officers and everything else detailed in the documents, it is hard to imagine the war could ever be won.

December 2009 inactivity

Wikileaks ran out of money in December 2009. The release of the "Collateral Murder" video sufficiently demonstrated to a jaded public what actual journalism looks like. The donations have been coming in again.


Wikileaks uses the MediaWiki software developed for Wikipedia. It used to allow public comments on talk pages, but doesn't now, and just uses the software as a content management system. That said, it's probably stuck with the famous name.


Wikileaks is funded by public donations. Send them some fucking money. But don't use PayPal as it was cut off on December 4 2010.[15]

External links

Alternative IP links:


  1. I would cite this, but I can't
  2. He has hosted one RationalWikian's anti-Scientology site since 1995, fending off countless frivolous legal threats.
  3. Precis and analysis; full PDF.
  4. WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange Wants To Spill Your Corporate Secrets (Andy Greenberg, Forbes, 2010-11-29)
  5. Never mind the fact that Canada ditched the death penalty several years ago.
  6. American right calls for blood - literally
  7. See this section of our BNP article.
  8. [1]
  10. Cablegate: WikiLeaks' diplomatic cable revelations so far - Sydney Morning Herald
  11. [2]
  12. [3]
  13. [4]
  14. [5]
  15. Paypal gets unfriendly

Welcome to the Wikisphere. Please proceed with caution:
  A Storehouse of Knowledge  -  Anarchopedia  -  Citizendium  -  Conservapedia  -  CreationWiki  -  EvoWiki  -  Infogalactic  -  Knowino  -  Metapedia  -  New World Encyclopedia  -  PESWiki  -  Palaeos  -  Psiram  -  RationalWikiWiki  -  RationalWikiWikiWiki  -  RationalWiki (français)  -  Rightpedia  -  SourceWatch  -  TV Tropes  -  TruthWiki  -  Wiki  -  Wiki4CAM  -  wikiFactor  -  WikiIslam  -  WikiSynergy  -  Wikipedia  
Personal tools