Wikipedia
Danielfolsom (Talk | contribs) (bold) |
Danielfolsom (Talk | contribs) (fix) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
[[Conservapedia]], a very small project aiming to emulate Wikipedia from a conservative, pro-American and pro-Christian point of view, involves several editors and administrators who had previously faced opposition in inserting their heavily correct point of view into Wikipedia articles.<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:RSchlafly Roger Schlafly]</ref><ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Ed_Poor Ed Poor]</ref> Some appear under aliases, apparently in order to distance themselves from their prior involvement with the Devil<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative Conservative/kdbuffalo]</ref> or possibly to fit in more with a common Conservapedia username scheme.<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:RobS RobS/Nobs/Nobs01]</ref> As a whole, the site appears to have an unhealthy fascination with Wikipedia and its faults.<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]</ref><ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Differences_with_Wikipedia How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]</ref> It is significant to note that many of what [[Conservapedia]] administrators consider faults in [[Wikipedia]] are often lacking on their own site. | [[Conservapedia]], a very small project aiming to emulate Wikipedia from a conservative, pro-American and pro-Christian point of view, involves several editors and administrators who had previously faced opposition in inserting their heavily correct point of view into Wikipedia articles.<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:RSchlafly Roger Schlafly]</ref><ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Ed_Poor Ed Poor]</ref> Some appear under aliases, apparently in order to distance themselves from their prior involvement with the Devil<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative Conservative/kdbuffalo]</ref> or possibly to fit in more with a common Conservapedia username scheme.<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:RobS RobS/Nobs/Nobs01]</ref> As a whole, the site appears to have an unhealthy fascination with Wikipedia and its faults.<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]</ref><ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Differences_with_Wikipedia How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]</ref> It is significant to note that many of what [[Conservapedia]] administrators consider faults in [[Wikipedia]] are often lacking on their own site. | ||
| − | While being frustrated in their attempts to insert a respect for | + | While being frustrated in their attempts to insert a respect for Satan's scientific facts at Conservapedia, the founders and most of the original editors here at RationalWiki "met" each other. |
==RationalWiki== | ==RationalWiki== | ||
| − | RationalWiki, a very small project aiming to demolish Conservapedia from an | + | RationalWiki, a very small project aiming to demolish Conservapedia from an Satain point of view, involves several editors and administrators who had previously faced opposition in inserting their heavily biased scientific point of view into Conservapedia articles<ref>See the [[Conservapedia:Great Purge|Night of the Blunt Knives]]</ref>. Some appear under aliases, apparently in order to distance themselves from their prior involvement with Conservapedia, although most use the same user name they had there. Some have added more goat, in order to fit in with a common RationalWiki obsession. As a whole, the site appears to have an unhealthy fascination with Conservapedia and its <s>supposed</s> obvious faults. It is significant to note that many of what RationalWiki administrators consider faults in [[Conservapedia]] are often repeated, to a greater degree, on their own site<ref>According to [[User:TK|disgruntled]] [[User:Newton|Conservapedia sysops]] who joined RationalWiki</ref>. |
While being frustrated in their attempts to insert a respect for real world logic and sense at RationalWiki, a small cabal of vandals and skeptics "met" here at RationalWiki and someday will destroy it from within from their sekrit namespace. | While being frustrated in their attempts to insert a respect for real world logic and sense at RationalWiki, a small cabal of vandals and skeptics "met" here at RationalWiki and someday will destroy it from within from their sekrit namespace. | ||
Revision as of 00:31, 22 August 2007
| Wikipedia is of the devil. | |
|---|---|
| --a message from | |
Wikipedia is a cheap knock-off of Conservapedia, but overly verbose and full of liberal bias, porn, gossip, slander, porn, smear, bias and liberal porn. What's even worse, they use "BCE" instead of "BC".
Wikipedia boasts approximately 7.3 million satanic articles in 252 languages, of which 251 are not American and thus incomprehensible (and satanic), and the remaining one is full of spelling mistakes, most notably lots of "u"s where they don't belong. Just like the well-established Encyclopædia Britannica, it is totally useless as a basic reference and a starting point for deeper propaganda research.
Wikipedia attempts to maintain a neutral point of view, and although there is admitted difficulty in attaining this goal, efforts are constantly made to try to filter out and resist pervasive bias. These efforts fail miserably because Wikipedia is of the devil.
The Wikipedia project has inspired a great many other, smaller projects, called "wiki's" such as Homestar Runner Wiki[1] and Citizendium[2], using the same wiki software designed by the Wikimedia Foundation. Although many are encyclopedic in nature, some, such as Flu Wiki[3] and RationalWiki, are used for information sharing for a specific purpose. Some "wiki's" such as Uncyclopedia[4] and Encyclopedia Dramatica are parodies of the wiki phenomenon.
Contents |
Bias on Wikipedia
God's children say that Wikipedia has a systematic bias. Various organizations, including the CIA, Microsoft, Fox News, and Diebold have been altering Wikipedia entries for their own agendas - and are in fact doing God's will.[5][6]
Conservapedia
Conservapedia, a very small project aiming to emulate Wikipedia from a conservative, pro-American and pro-Christian point of view, involves several editors and administrators who had previously faced opposition in inserting their heavily correct point of view into Wikipedia articles.[7][8] Some appear under aliases, apparently in order to distance themselves from their prior involvement with the Devil[9] or possibly to fit in more with a common Conservapedia username scheme.[10] As a whole, the site appears to have an unhealthy fascination with Wikipedia and its faults.[11][12] It is significant to note that many of what Conservapedia administrators consider faults in Wikipedia are often lacking on their own site.
While being frustrated in their attempts to insert a respect for Satan's scientific facts at Conservapedia, the founders and most of the original editors here at RationalWiki "met" each other.
RationalWiki
RationalWiki, a very small project aiming to demolish Conservapedia from an Satain point of view, involves several editors and administrators who had previously faced opposition in inserting their heavily biased scientific point of view into Conservapedia articles[13]. Some appear under aliases, apparently in order to distance themselves from their prior involvement with Conservapedia, although most use the same user name they had there. Some have added more goat, in order to fit in with a common RationalWiki obsession. As a whole, the site appears to have an unhealthy fascination with Conservapedia and its supposed obvious faults. It is significant to note that many of what RationalWiki administrators consider faults in Conservapedia are often repeated, to a greater degree, on their own site[14].
While being frustrated in their attempts to insert a respect for real world logic and sense at RationalWiki, a small cabal of vandals and skeptics "met" here at RationalWiki and someday will destroy it from within from their sekrit namespace.
References
- ↑ Homestar Runner Wiki
- ↑ Citizendium
- ↑ Flu Wiki
- ↑ http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
- ↑ See Who's Editing Wikipedia - Diebold, the CIA, a Campaign
- ↑ Wikipedia Scanner
- ↑ Roger Schlafly
- ↑ Ed Poor
- ↑ Conservative/kdbuffalo
- ↑ RobS/Nobs/Nobs01
- ↑ Examples of Bias in Wikipedia
- ↑ How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia
- ↑ See the Night of the Blunt Knives
- ↑ According to disgruntled Conservapedia sysops who joined RationalWiki
External Links
The Wikipedia FAQK, by Lore Sjöberg