Category talk:In-text templates
From RationalWiki
Seems like a struggle to own some crap to me. ħuman
01:25, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
- No, it's just to be handy. We need some way of keeping track of all of our templates.
Radioactive Misanthrope 01:33, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
- Not making sense to anyone but you, though. So no help at all. ħuman
01:51, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
- No one else has voiced an opinion, so how can you say, "Anyone"?
Radioactive Misanthrope 02:02, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
- No one else has voiced an opinion, so how can you say, "Anyone"?
- Not making sense to anyone but you, though. So no help at all. ħuman
- And by the way, how come your personal evaluation of anything is always the default position of RationalWiki? Even Trent isn't that bad.
Radioactive Misanthrope 02:02, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
- Well, first, you're doing it in the middle of the night, and you haven't discussed it with anyone else. You have not talked to the mob. You have not shared your brilliant idea with anyone. You haven't thought how to make it easy for noobs to find. You're just on a trip you think is good (maybe it is?) but you are acting unilaterally. Why not start a conversation, say, at talk:main? Get some acclamation, then go do the work? ħuman
02:07, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
- Well, first, you're doing it in the middle of the night, and you haven't discussed it with anyone else. You have not talked to the mob. You have not shared your brilliant idea with anyone. You haven't thought how to make it easy for noobs to find. You're just on a trip you think is good (maybe it is?) but you are acting unilaterally. Why not start a conversation, say, at talk:main? Get some acclamation, then go do the work? ħuman
- And by the way, how come your personal evaluation of anything is always the default position of RationalWiki? Even Trent isn't that bad.