Category talk:Logic

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I find circular catting a bit annoying that is all. If I can come up with a good technical reason for it I will otherwise I am not really fussed. - π 03:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

From an outsider's perspective, I agree with Π. What's the point of having a "See also" scenario on both categories. It's like the old joke "How keep and idiot occupied: turn over." You turn over the page, and it reads, "How to keep and idiot occupied: turn over."The Goonie 1 (talk) 03:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure what I reverted, of course, it being that time of night, but there's no problem with two cats being "in" each other. Like my edit comment, it ain't a tree, it's a web. But if I made things ugly again, please feel free to school me. Oh, and if someone keeps clicking back and forth between the two cats, well... at least we've "occupied" them? ħumanUser talk:Human 03:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I remember struggling with this issue (probably to myself before). The evaluating arguments, logic, assessing pseudoscience and cognitive bias categories are all a bit complicated. I take blame for the evaluating arguments one, as it was I who came up with it as an umbrella term back in 07(!), and I know we didn't agree then. It's never been clear to me what's distinctive about assessing pseudoscience. So I dunno, basically, what to do. Sterile antidisestablishmentarianist 02:30, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Toolbox
support