Conservapedia talk:Moronic vandalism

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Is this necessary? Could we flesh it out more if it is? Researcher 21:58, 9 November 2008 (EST)

It looks like little more than a low-vote WIGO entry to me... I moved it to the CP namespace for now, at least. ħumanUser talk:Human 18:31, 23 November 2008 (EST)

Given the intelligence level of CP-acceptable persons does the MV status indicate a higher IQ?82.44.143.26 (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete[edit]

It was pointed out years ago that this is nothing more than a short list of shitty WIGOs. Convince me we need this. P-Foster (talk) 22:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

It is against the rules to post moronic vandalism on WIGO@Conservapedia. Colbert|FanThe little guy is putting the man down! 23:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
For a reason. Moving it here doesn't change that. P-Foster (talk) 23:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  • delete. moronic vandalism is moronic. --Scream!! (talk) 23:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Neglected and not needed. Blue (pester) 17:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Merge It[edit]

We should just merge it with some other CP related article about their blocking policies. Maybe Conservapedia:Block Reasons.Klaus Vos (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)