“”Creationists believe that man was instantaneously created by God, based on an account in a book called the Bible.
Several thousand years ago, a small tribe of ignorant near-savages wrote various collections of myths, wild tales, lies, and gibberish. Over the centuries, the stories were embroidered, garbled, mutilated, and torn into small pieces that were then repeatedly shuffled. Finally, this material was badly translated into several languages successively.The resultant text, creationists feel, is the best guide to this complex and technical subject.
|—Science Made Stupid |
Creationism refers to the belief that the universe and everything in it were specially created by God through magic, rather than naturalistic means. Creationism implicitly relies on the claim that there is a "purpose" to all creation known only to the creator. To some extent, Creationists believe that this purpose is revealed in scripture or holy writings. However, intelligent design is increasingly being touted as an additional means of detecting "design," and therefore purpose, in nature. As no person has made direct empirical observation of the results of a supernatural creator's work, we are incapable of discerning what was specially created and what was not. Design becomes indistinguishable from nature, and Intelligent design indistinguishable from guessing.
Belief in a literal reading of holy texts, such as Genesis in Abrahamic religions, is the foundation of creationism. Literalism is a tenet shared by fundamentalists of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, and is strongly espoused in the West by the American Christian fundamentalist movement.
In recent years, fundamentalist Christians attempt to reconcile inconsistencies between a literal reading of the Bible and science. Creation science is a direct response to the concerns of believers that their faith is indefensible as being completely at odds with science. Biblical literalists face the additional difficulty of massaging their exegesis to mind their prejudices: if the Bible is the inerrant word of God and one bit of it is wrong, the whole house of cards comes tumbling down. Intelligent design advocates claim that intelligent does not depend on special creation by the fiat of any god, and therefore is a scientific theory like any other. The claim is apparently false, as the Discovery Institute, currently the leading promoter of intelligent design in the United States, was remarkably candid in admitting in the wedge strategy document that its purpose is to advocate creationism on purely religious grounds.
The term "creationism" is often used as a synonym for the specific ideology of "young Earth creationism". Young Earth creationism is the belief that Genesis chapters 1 and 2 are God's historical account of his creation, given to Moses during the Exodus. Based on Bishop James Ussher's Biblical genealogies, young Earth creationists believe that God created the universe and everything in it over the course of six, 24-hour, solar days approximately 6,000 years ago.
Other varieties of creationism are sometimes less in conflict with empirical observations; and those, such as deist beliefs, which have the least divine intervention are the least in conflict.
Creationists can be categorized in a number of ways according to the specifics of the creationist belief. These include:
- Religion: Creationists can be of virtually any religious stripe, from fundamentalist Christians to Pastafarians.
- Interpretation of Genesis: Young Earth creationists believe Genesis is historically and scientifically accurate. No one else does.
- Age of the Earth: Most sane people think, based on voluminous evidence, that the Earth is billions of years old — and know that it is older than 6,000 years. Young earth creationists, by contrast, maintain that Earth is around 6,000 years old, although there are some that claim ages up to 100,000 years.
- Identity of creator: Biblical creationists believe the creator was the God of the Bible, or YHWH. Advocates of intelligent design claim that they don't propose a specifically religious designer; this is a bald-faced lie, as the cdesign proponentsists debacle showed. Extraterrestrial creationists (such as the followers of Raëlism) believe that the creation of life on Earth and/or Homo sapiens was the result of alien intervention, be it direct meddling or blind "seeding" of life across the Universe. In a remarkable effort to distance itself from creationism, even the Discovery Institute has occasionally flirted with this idea in claiming that it is agnostic as to the identity of the "designer", but the Wedge Document makes clear their true convictions: to promote Christian creationism in public schools and government.
 Old Earth creationism
"Old Earth" creationists accept a conventional age of the Earth of 4.5 billion years (known as deep time) as has been known since the 19th Century. Similarly, they accept the dating methods used to reach this figure, including radiometric dating and ice-core dating. Nevertheless, they believe that life was deliberately created and possibly mucked about with by a religious deity — thus "Old Earth" creationists mostly differ in their attitude towards evolution, rather than other branches of established science such as geology. Evolutionary Creationists believe the creation event took place, and life subsequently developed through the process of evolution. Day Age Creationism is a literal interpretation of Genesis concluding that creation took place as claimed in Genesis, but that each of the "days" represents a vast period of time. The framework interpretation of Genesis, advanced by Biblical scholar Meredith Kline, is a literal interpretation of Genesis that posits that the Genesis account is not to be taken as a historical or scientific description of creation, but as an allegorical and theological one. Progressive creationism is predicated on accepting mainstream scientific findings regarding the age of the Earth, but positing that God progressively created new creatures over the course of millions of years. Gap creationists believe that the Earth was created millions of years ago, but then laid waste and remade as described in Genesis 1:2 over the course of six 24 solar hour days.
 Young Earth creationism
"Young Earth" creationists reject the scientific consensus on the age of the Earth in favour of dating creation based on the Bible, usually by referring to Bishop James Ussher's Biblical genealogies. As their faith is based on accepting Genesis as history, it is wholly inconsistent with the nearly unanimous scientific consensus that the Earth is far older than young earthers accept. In order to justify their literalist dogma, young earth creationists must reject numerous branches of science. Young earth creationists created "creation science" to bolster their Biblical claims regarding the age of the earth and their opposition to the theory of evolution.
Young Earth creationists typically acknowledge parts of evolution when denial would be too much, terming it microevolution, but continue to reject any theory of naturalistic abiogenesis and common descent. Instead, they believe that God created various lifeforms in something resembling their present forms, and that microevolution subsequently led to a degree of diversification among species - a branch of creation science known as baraminology has developed to try and explain this. This has led to a bit of an inconsistent position on creationists' part, in which they deny that millions of years of evolution could possibly produce speciation, but at the same time argue that thousands of years of microevolution was enough to give rise to the great diversity of life we see on Earth today solely from the pairs of animals that survived the flood on Noah's ark some 4,000 years ago.
Some young Earth beliefs even go as far as to state that the universe itself is only 6,000 years old, and that their creator god created space and time at the same instant as our planet. This is again in conflict with even more fields of tested science. In the case of a young universe beliefs, physical constants such as the speed of light are often reinterpreted as "inconstant" to explain phenomena such as distant starlight.
Particularly in the United States, the most prevalent young Earth belief is based on the Judeo-Christian mythology laid out in the Old Testament. This includes interpreting the various stories scattered throughout the book as historically accurate — the Tower of Babel and the global flood, for example. One of the additional issues with a literal interpretation of some holy texts is that they conflict, sometimes with themselves; this is especially true of Genesis. According to Genesis 1, God created the world in six days, resting on the seventh, with Man and Woman being created simultaneously, after the plants and animals. However, according to Genesis 2, God creates Man, then the plants and animals, then Woman as company for Adam. There have been several attempts to skirt this issue, but none of them produce a completely literal yet consistent reading — they are flat-out contradictions.
Though they would love to keep this out of the public sphere and make it seem as if they were just scientists, Creationist thought is not based just on Genesis 1 and 2. They also insist stories like that of Noah's Ark are historically accurate. Of course, this therefore leads to a valid question: what do they think about Cain and Abel? For generations, Southern Protestants that believed the earth was only several thousand years old also insisted that dark skin pigmentation was in fact 'The Mark of Cain', a blood curse making them inferior to humans and worthy of enslavement.
Although creationism in the west is more usually associated with fundamentalist Christianity, the Muslim world has its own brand of crazies — and creationist beliefs are often more prevalent in Muslim countries than America's Bible Belt. Unlike the young Earth creationist movements within Christianity, few, if any, Muslim creationists insist that the world was created in a matter of days a few thousand years ago as most accept the Koran as a metaphorical and contemplative document. Translations of six "days" are also far more ambiguous than their explicitly Christian counterpart. However, they do reject evolution, and especially the notion that humans evolved from animals, they accept that the Earth and Universe are old.Even though in chapter 2 verse 29 of the quran it clearly says that the earth,and every thing in it is older than the universe and every thing else in it.
Perhaps the most famous Islamic creationist is the Turkish creationist Harun Yahya, who has been heavily influenced by American Christian creationism. In recent years, he has become one of the more vocal creationists and some of his publicity stunts and ramblings would make even Ted Haggard blush. He has repeatedly been shown to not know what he is talking about, such as with his Ask Darwinists question sheet (which even an amateur could answer easily) and mistaking a fishing lure for a live animal in one of his books. In line with Gish Gallop tactics, Yahya is probably there just to waste people's time and try to keep the "controversy" in the public eye in order to bilk more money out of the faithful, rather than make any real contribution.
Hindu creationism has been embraced by some writers such as Michael Cremo. They say that mankind has existed for two billion years and has not evolved and point to supposed "out of place artifacts" and paranormal reports for evidence. The claims of the Hindu creationists have been dismissed by the scientific community as pseudoscience.
A 2012 Gallup poll reveals that 15% of Americans agree with the statement: "Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God had no part in this process." 46% believe that "God created human beings pretty much in their present form within the last 10,000 years or so." 38% fall somewhere in the middle and think that "Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God guided this process." Thus, 51% of Americans accept the theory of evolution in some form, whether theistic evolution or more the purely scientific theory of evolution.
 Intelligent design
Intelligent design (ID) is an idea fundamental to the attempted "mainstreaming" of creationism; it has been "politely" referred to as creationism in a cheap suit. It is a teleological argument or belief that complexity requires design, but it is also an argument from personal incredulity that natural causes are behind life, indeed, most "research" into intelligent design focuses on attempting to pick holes in known evolutionary theories, rather than attempting to establish any positive evidence in favour of a designer. Principles such as emergence and complexity theory are inherently incompatible with ID as these can explain apparent complexity using naturalistic means. One of the main proposals by intelligent design advocates is that it is not creationism, as the hypothesis doesn't specifically state what the identity of the creator is. However, the vast majority of intelligent design proponents, and especially the ones following the wedge strategy are Christian fundamentalists and don't hide it very well; consequently, they are often hostile to secular or atheistic forms of intelligent design such as directed panspermia.
 Ethical objections to creationism
Apart from almost every field of science, creationism based on Biblical literalism also has some ethical criticism to face. One main objection is that, in the ever so lauded KJV version of Genesis 1:28, God says to the first humans,"God blessed them and said to them, Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground." Implying humans can do what they wish to all animals. See here for more details.
 In a nutshell
 See also
- Old Earth creationism
- Young Earth creationism
- Creation science
- Creation Week
- Creation and social history
- Creationism in schools
- Creationism in the UK
- Creationist escape hatches
- Evidence against a recent creation
- Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
- Expelled: Leader's Guide
- Peter Vardy
- A list of Things Creationists Hate. It's a big list.
- Scientific American: 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense
- Scientific American: The Latest Face of Creationism in the Classroom
- The “Threat” of Creationism, by Isaac Asimov published in Science and Creationism (in 1984!!! still crazy after all these years)
- Geological Society of London doesn't like creationism (or Intelligent Design)
- Geological Society of Australia Intelligent Design Policy (PDF)
- Lewis Black explains Creationist Bullshit
- ↑ For an example, see our side-by-side response to the CMI article, Snake Carnivory Origin.
- ↑ Appelbaum, Stanley, selection, translation and text, Simplicissimus: 180 Satirical Drawings from the Famous German Weekly, Dover Publications, New York, 1975
- ↑ International Humanist News
- ↑ About.com Islam - Six "Days" or Long Periods of Time
- ↑ In US, 46% Hold Creationist View of Human Origins, Highly religions Americans most likely to believe in creationism