Campaign!

G'day, fellow RationalWikians! Don't forget to visit the Campaign page of the 2016 Board of trustees election in order to make your voice heard. Suggested activities include:

  • Endorsing select candidates (lending a hand to your loyal henchmen and/or glorious overlords!)
  • Anti-endorsing select candidates (character-assassinating your hated opponents!)
  • Providing moar goat (please wipe afterwards)
  • Just asking questions to the candidates

Your participation might help other users better direct their votes. More importantly, it'll show the world that we've yet to go full Citizendium in terms of election hype!

from FuzzyCatPotato (Talk), group Site wide (urgent) at 00:24, 25 July 2016

DDT

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
C14H9Cl5
The poetry of reality

Science

Icon science.svg
Extraordinary claims with
extraordinary evidence
Hot from the
giants' shoulders

DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) is a powerful halocarbon insecticide[1] with a controversial history. It is an extremely stable and decay-resistant chemical: the discoverer found that jars that had contained DDT and were subsequently autoclaved[2] still had enough DDT residue in them to kill insects. A little goes a long way.

DDT use was restricted and then banned in most Western countries in the 1960s and '70s, and in those countries where it remains legal, it is only used as a health measure to control the mosquitoes that spread malaria. Only India still manufactures it. The Stockholm Convention[wp] was signed in 2001 to restrict the use of Persistent Organic Pollutants, of which DDT is the most well known (yes, DDT is organic - in the chemical sense of the word).

Contents

[edit] DDT bans and mass murder

[DDT] should be used with caution, only when needed, and when no other effective, safe and affordable alternatives are locally available.
—Brenda Eskenazi, explaining the scientific consensus on DDT[3]

Horrifically stupid wingnuts and experts for hire will sometimes imply that a supposed worldwide ban on DDT has killed millions of people by giving them malaria or some other mosquito-borne disease, and that Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring was responsible for the alleged ban. The myth seems to have originated from the Competitive Enterprise Institute and from libertarian Roger Bate (and is promoted by his organization Africa Fighting Malaria).

Carson devoted some of her book into weighing the pros and cons of DDT use,[4] but her findings did not lead to a global ban. DDT got banned in dozens of countries, but there was (and still is) no global ban on DDT; only agricultural use is almost globally banned. Places with deadly mosquito-borne illnesses still use DDT, and in some places excessive use has led to the development of DDT-resistant mosquitoes.[5][6] In fact, the drastic reduction of DDT use in agriculture delayed the onset of resistance in mosquitoes.

Not only is DDT still approved by WHO for use against malaria (in indoor residual spraying,[wp] which is the spraying of walls of a home so a mosquito landing after it bites should get a fatal dose), but the Persistent Organic Pollutants Treaty (POPs) has a special clause for DDT.[7] Any nation may endorse the treaty calling for an end to DDT; but any nation may also use DDT at any time, for severe health reasons, by essentially writing a letter to WHO saying, "We have a health problem we think DDT may be useful to combat, so we're going to use DDT."[8]

[edit] The grain of truth beneath the Bullshit

There were several aggressive - and often successful - attempts to get rid of Malaria in places where it was endemic until then.[9] Those attempts used DDT as it was cheap, effective and its negative effects were not yet known or understood. While there were huge successes in the 1950s, local factors, including the premature abandoning of efforts lead to a resurgence of Malaria in places where it had been significantly decreased or on the brink of extinction. By the 1970s even the WHO had to admit that the program to globally eradicate Malaria had failed, even though there were some remarkable successes. However, in no case was a successful eradication program stopped due to concerns regarding DDT.

[edit] More DDT deniers

[edit] External links

[edit] Footnotes

  1. Though one Brazilian bee Eufriesea purpurata is known to collect DDT, probably in an attempt by the males to attract females. See: Revisiting the organohalogens associated with 1979-samples of Brazilian bees (Eufriesea purpurata) and The Bees of the World, Volume 1 by Charles Duncan Michener.
  2. Brought up to a very high pressure and temperature in a specially designed device (the autoclave) and left to react.
  3. Should DDT Be Used to Combat Malaria?, Scientific American
  4. The Unending War on Rachel Carson, ScienceBlogs
  5. The DDT story, Pesticide Action Network
  6. Rachel Carson Didn’t Kill Millions of Africans, Slate
  7. DDT Overview, Stockholm Convention
  8. Ed Darrell, in comments
  9. See here[wp] for the US example
  10. DDT is #1 in "The 5 Most Ridiculously Over-Hyped Health Scares of All Time" (2008), and mentioned in the "Bugs" entry of "4 Irrational Fears That Aren't as Irrational as They Seem" (2014)
  11. You pesky liberal fascists, trying to stop poison gas! And more fascism!
  12. Townhall, enter if you dare.
  13. It's WND, so prepare your soul
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools