Debate talk:Logical proof of the existence of God
From RationalWiki
Cue the bickering between Jeeves and AKjeldsen in 3, 2, 1...
Radioactive Misanthrope 05:18, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- I particularly like the variant spelling : Title v Content. Toast 05:33, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- I don't understand. What are you talking about?
Radioactive Misanthrope 05:35, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- Existance : existence. Toast 05:48, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- Ah, I see now. Thanks.
Radioactive Misanthrope 17:16, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- Ah, I see now. Thanks.
- Existance : existence. Toast 05:48, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- I don't understand. What are you talking about?
[edit] Side by side
Would this be better as a side-by-side so that we can analyse it point by point?--Bobbing up 06:24, 4 January 2009 (EST)