Essay:Why all Religious Morality Sucks

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Drive by.gif
For your information: Some drive-by editor spammed us with this, and though we decided not to delete it, we don't really care much for it. The talk page is probably a lot more interesting than the actual essay.


Essay.svg This essay is an original work by Proxima Centauri (and anyone who wants to improve it).
It does not necessarily reflect the views expressed in RationalWiki's Mission Statement, but we welcome discussion of a broad range of ideas.
Unless otherwise stated, this is original content, released under CC-BY-SA 3.0 or any later version. See RationalWiki:Copyrights.
Feel free to make comments on the talk page, which will probably be far more interesting, and might reflect a broader range of RationalWiki editors' thoughts.

Basically any religion has an absolute morality[citation needed]. Good and bad are as defined by the godhead and as interpreted by his/her representatives on earth, the priesthood[citation needed]. Most (all?) religions have, at their heart, the premise that good behaviour leads to rewards in the afterlife[citation needed]. As such anyone who does not follow the rules as laid down by the priesthood are, by definition, destined for bad things in the afterlife and god would only do that to bad people[citation needed]. Hence, logically, it follows that anyone who doesn't follow a particular religion's set of rules is, by their definition, bad[citation needed]. That really sucks.[citation needed]

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support