File talk:B 16 2 4.jpg
From RationalWiki
Not to be an image-use nazi totalitarian, but could you provide the url of the image's source (assuming you got it off the internet) and a fair use justification/release of rights? --
Radioactive Misanthrope 15:26, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- Are you a member of the Fair Use National Socialist Party?Jellyfish! 15:28, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- Are you an image-use nazi or just a run of the mill image-use fascist? Rational Edthink! 15:29, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- There. I reworded it to be as generic as possible, killing my sentence's word
flowdevelopement. Thanks a lot. --
Radioactive Misanthrope 15:32, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- I've improved your above comment. No need to thank me. Pro bono yellyfish. Jellyfish! 15:34, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- I love the way the red blood cells come tumbling out of that hose-like blood vessel like coins out of a one-armed bandit. Rational Edthink! 15:43, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- Wow, did you get that from a book? Because that was actually well-written. : ) --
Radioactive Misanthrope 15:46, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- I beg your pardon! Don't sound so surprised. :-) Rational Edthink! 15:51, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- Wow, did you get that from a book? Because that was actually well-written. : ) --
- I love the way the red blood cells come tumbling out of that hose-like blood vessel like coins out of a one-armed bandit. Rational Edthink! 15:43, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- I've improved your above comment. No need to thank me. Pro bono yellyfish. Jellyfish! 15:34, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- There. I reworded it to be as generic as possible, killing my sentence's word
- Are you an image-use nazi or just a run of the mill image-use fascist? Rational Edthink! 15:29, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
(unindent)Actually I uploaded the wrong file. The one I meant to take was from the wikimedia commons, which I'm fairly sure is all fair use. I'm taking it off the page now seeing as how I hit a brick wall trying to find someone to attribute it to (doctor's office site ... they have no idea where they got it). Please correct me if I'm wrong on the commons. Cranial Suppositorypull your head out of your ass 16:15, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- Not all of it is necessarily fair use, but if it's there, then you can simply skim the licensing info to determine if it is. --
Radioactive Misanthrope 16:22, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- I think it's all fair use on wikicommons, but the catch is that images there can be removed, and then they no longer count as fair use. I think Jellyfish!Do I contradict myself? Very well then, I contradict myself. I am large, I contain multitudes. 16:21, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- If they're on WC they're OK but should have the same copyright notice used here as there.
ContribsTalk 16:24, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- (Edit conflict) Just because it's been removed doesn't necessarily mean it's no longer fair use. More often, an image is removed because Wikipedia uses a stricter definition of fair use than any other place does. --
Radioactive Misanthrope 16:27, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- If they're on WC they're OK but should have the same copyright notice used here as there.