Fun talk:Schlafly Quote Generator/Archive1

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This is an archive page, last updated 14 April 2010. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page:   , (new)(back)

I looked at your contributions today and want to you everyone know.

Your grammar doth need fixing, methinks. Star of David.png Radioactive Misanthrope 02:15, 23 September 2008 (EDT)

No no, that's a direct quote (the "want to you" part). It had something after it in the original, but it didn't make much more sense then, either. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 21:57, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh.  : D Star of David.png Radioactive Misanthrope 23:44, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
My ears are burning. Insert Name Here 06:34, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
 :P --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 08:57, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
ZOMG! teh assfly is in my computer...watching me!!!!-- Asclepius staff.png-PalMD --It hurts when I do "this" 07:44, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

As long as it lasts, I hope you don't mind this. Editor at CPOh, Finland! Why? 07:48, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

Love it, Editor. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 07:52, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
Aw! They took it down! :( --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 07:55, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
Maybe my English is not good enough, but doesn't "No links for the not so wise monkeys, thank you" mean that Conservapedia users are stupid monkeys, who must be spared dangerous links? Editor at CPOh, Finland! Why? 07:58, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
lol. I didn't notice that. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 08:02, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

This is absolutely EXCELLENT and deserving of at least 7,000,000 points or 2.3 goats!! SusanG  ContribsTalk 12:49, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

I could use 7,000,000 points...then again, it's been a long time since I've had delicious goat milk...--Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 12:54, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
Unfortunately all our goats are Billys and should NOT be milked under any circlestations. SusanG  ContribsTalk 13:00, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh shi- --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 14:06, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

I think there needs to be a template version of this, with a parametrised name and the current timestamp so we can inject schlaflisms in to conversations at will. --JeevesMkII 12:56, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

I agree. I was actually gonna ask if doing the current time stamp was possible. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 12:58, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

Didn't Hoji do a very similar thing quite a while back? We should link both in the Newcomer's guide or some such visible place. DickTurpis 13:00, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

He made a Schlafly generator, or an auto-stamp? --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 13:04, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
A generator, quite a bit like this, but much less in-depth. I'm looking for it, but forget what it was called and what namespace it was in. DickTurpis 13:09, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
Here it is:Fun:Schlafly Quote Generator. DickTurpis 13:10, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
Oooo, a predecessor! --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 13:14, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

This is indeed one of the most awesomesonic things on this website. ArmondikoVpostate 13:07, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

Thank you! :D --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 13:14, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

Love the scare quotes, Dick. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 13:20, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

For the date: you could stick {{now}} (20:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)) or {{subst:Now}} (20:08, 27 April, 2015 (UTC)) SusanG  ContribsTalk 14:15, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
Excellent! --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 14:18, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

I wonder if in the future we might develop our own kind of Turing Machine test, and see if we can debate this infernal device instead of the real Andy? We might be able to slowly reduce the number of optional lines until he eventually and finally goes silent, and at that moment become free of our obsession with the fuckwit man? DogP 17:49, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

I demand this machine be constructed using Wang tiles, so I can snigger about Schlafly talking to his wang. --JeevesMkII 18:32, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
Are you a physician? A PhD credentialed in this field? If so, then state your credentials. If not, then forget about it here.--Aschlafly 14:48, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
I am a medical doctor, born, trained, and practicing in the US, a clinical assistant professor of medicine at a major university. If you wish to know more, I can hunt down my Curriculum Vitae for you...palmd001
Internal medicine is not a field of specialty for sexually transmitted diseases. So I don't see anything that would qualify you to speak about prevention. This is not the place for public-school type sex education claims and speculation. Aschlafly [2]
I assume the Schlafly "article-o-matic" will be next on the adgenda, saves people having to write entries themselves if they want to complete the article matrix. I can see it now: "San Francisco Deciet is deciet made by homosexuals in San Franscisco. The End." ArmondikoVpostate 05:31, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
My stomach hurts from laughing. Plus, "I'm so proud!" <bursts into tears> Fretfulporpentine 18:35, 26 October 2008 (EDT)

Contents

[edit] A bit long

This quote generator is getting a bit long. Aschalfly doesn't often make such long statements, he is usually, err, concise. Just something I noticed. Ace McWickedcast ye the first stone 18:00, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

I agree in that I don't think it needs to get any longer. But this seems about right for one of his more lengthy screeds. I might re-sort it a bit for the sake of clarity, though, since it sometimes doesn't run together as well as I'd like (although, that might in fact be what makes it sound so authentic sometimes...). --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 03:27, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
Is is possible to embed choose tags within other choose tags without it going crazy so sometimes it's concise and sometimes its long, yet still consistent enough to be funny rather than plain wierd? ArmondikoVpostate 13:45, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
Sadly, no, at least not the last time I tried. Even using nested templates it doesn't work. ħumanUser talk:Human 18:11, 5 October 2008 (EDT)

[edit] +100 internet points

I will be using this to add responses on Conservapedia talkpages at once. Hopefully this will improve the discourse. Teabag 05:55, 27 September 2008 (EDT)

Not that that's very hard.  : ) Star of David.png Radioactive Misanthrope 06:03, 27 September 2008 (EDT)

SpockWin.jpg— Unsigned, by: Stile4aly / talk / contribs

Spock! I didn't know you cared! :) --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 13:59, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
I came late to this thing, it is teh awesome by goat! ħumanUser talk:Human 18:12, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
I'm rather pleased with the collaborative effort that's gone into it. The Schlaf' never had so many fans... --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 00:12, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

[edit] It was better before

It used to be simple, but there's too many goats in it now. Makes it less believable. I'm removing goats. DogP 19:52, 26 October 2008 (EDT)

Moar goats seen, pleez to remove, goats not schlaflyspeak. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:43, 4 December 2008 (EST)

[edit] Bilingual education?

When/where did Andy rant against bilingual education? I need links in order to understand the guy's mind and, of course, laugh at the bizarre conversation that inevitably came up. NightFlare Another formula [besides R = V / I] (which I remember via the mnemonic "Victory In RhodeIsland") is: V = R * I Voltage = resistance times current Is this true, or even useful?[1] 22:28, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

It was fairly recent, actually. Can't remember where it was from, though. Might be in the WIGO files for September... --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 01:01, 28 October 2008 (EDT)
Found it, luckily it was copy/pasted here.
The foreign languages thing died pretty quickly sadly. It's nice to see how he suggests (orders? the article is rather ambiguous) homeschooling groups to speak only english on classes unrelated to a foreign language, yet he dismisses the criticism by mentioning public schools... where you MUST comply with the suggestion. NightFlare Another formula [besides R = V / I] (which I remember via the mnemonic "Victory In RhodeIsland") is: V = R * I Voltage = resistance times current Is this true, or even useful?[1] 17:43, 28 October 2008 (EDT)
Eureka! It's all coming back to me...God...I forgot from whence this stupidity came. :p --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 08:01, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

[edit] ..., so it's obvious to me you're trying to vaccinate me.

Uhm, no. --Just passing by 12:53, 28 November 2008 (EST)

[edit] namespace

Shouldn't this actually be in "template" rather than fun? (I know, it might fixing a lot of links, but it is a 'template', not an 'article'?)? ?? ħumanUser talk:Human 00:41, 4 December 2008 (EST)

Is this really a template? I never really thought about it, but I wouldn't say so. It is possible to call it as a template, but it looks rather silly doing so. Pinto's5150 Talk 01:35, 4 December 2008 (EST)

 (sounds like another self-centered liberal, like Obama), I'm not going to allow concealment here of how abortion increases risk of breast cancer. I wasted time with your unsubstantial additions and it's the high word:substance ratio that characterizes the liberal every time, so admit it, you're not here to think and learn. And you persist in denying the obvious truth that pregnancy reduces language devolution. Got news for you: Evolution conflicts with logic, science, and Christianity. Blindly follow your chosen "experts" somewhere else. This is a wiki devoted to the pursuit of knowledge. Understand??? That means opening your mind and actually using it. Godspeed.--Andy Schlafly

I sorta see your point. However, if the header and box were noincluded, it could be used to place a random comment in a talkpage, right? How about taking the generator itself and moving it to an short-named template (like template:assquote?), and transcluding it to this page for the fully functioning version (add a link to the template on the page, of course). Just a thought, to make it more flexible? ħumanUser talk:Human 16:57, 4 December 2008 (EST)

(I always come late to these discussions for some reason...) I like that idea, and if you haven't already done it, I will! :D --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 04:44, 12 December 2008 (EST)

[edit] Template

I haz maed it.--Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 05:24, 12 December 2008 (EST)

"Anonymous User" (sounds like another self-centered liberal, like Obama), your links are not applicable to the typical situation, as addressed by Jesus. I looked at many of your edits before reverting them and like most liberals you act like you're smarter than every one else and hope that people will agree with you because you seem smart and "reasonable", so it's obvious to me you're trying to spread liberal hearsay. Your atheistic worldview has led you to deny that cremating heretics deters genocide. Got news for you: plate tectonics is used to pull students away from accepting the Flood. Open your mind a bit, please, for your own sake. Godspeed.--aschlafly 20:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I disagree, Andy. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 05:24, 12 December 2008 (EST)
Except for some reason you can't have the name doohickey on the same page twice...... --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 05:27, 12 December 2008 (EST)

[edit] Pure goat

This template is emphatically only for things that Andy says himself. As he's not said anything about pure goats, cut that lingo.-Diadochus 14:46, 4 February 2009 (EST)

That's what I thought, too. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistorfeline fanatic 14:48, 4 February 2009 (EST)
You were 100% correct CUR. Congratulations. SirChuckBA product of Affirmative Action 15:04, 4 February 2009 (EST)
<does a little jig>Yippee! Go me! --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistorfeline fanatic 15:05, 4 February 2009 (EST)
A caveat: It IS mostly for things he said, but one IS allowed to be a bit creative about it. That said, the goat thing was right to go. At minimum, it has to be in his style. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 20:57, 4 February 2009 (EST)
His style: You deny renaming French fries freedom fries causes Franch to ally with the U.S. When will that be added? --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistorfeline fanatic 21:01, 4 February 2009 (EST)
He never talks about that, either. ħumanUser talk:Human 21:39, 4 February 2009 (EST)
But it is in his style. And the Bush Administration ordered that the cafeteria in Congress rename them that in protest. So come on, he would have said something about it. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistorfeline fanatic 21:40, 4 February 2009 (EST)
Emphatically only what he's actually said.-Diadochus 21:45, 4 February 2009 (EST)
It wasn't Bush, it was Congress that did the rename. And it was what, 6 years ago? Stick to things Schlafly actually says, ideally, very often. This generator should be almost indistinguishable from something Schlafly would really say - it needs to prove Poe's Law perfectly. Please don't fuck it up. Why not make your own version in your userspace? ħumanUser talk:Human 21:49, 4 February 2009 (EST)
I was looking at what Yossie said. --"ConservapediaUndergroundTransistorfeline fanatic 21:50, 4 February 2009 (EST)

<unindent>I was perhaps a bit unclear. There is a bit of a mad-libs quality to this thing, and that's where most of the creativity comes in. For example, just taking a randomly generated sample from the page, Assfly has never said "You even deny winning in Iraq prevents Hollywood values" ("Winning in Iraq" and "Hollywood values" being the randomly selected options). But those are two of his favourite talking points, and that sentence is based pretty closely on his usual "debating" style. It's absurd (which is the point, really), and perhaps a bit of a stretch...but would anybody be terribly surprised if one day he came up with that? Probably not. It's not sufficient to simply insert the wacky and the stupid. Anybody can be stupid. But can you be Andy Schlafly Stupid (TM)? To really get it right, you have to at be true to your subject, and with this thing, it's better not to go too far from reality. I mean, the subject is pretty hard to get wrong if you just look at anything he's EVER written. So, it's okay to tailor it A LITTLE. But Human is right, it's mostly meant for real quotations. I apologise if my previous post threw you off. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 07:14, 5 February 2009 (EST)

PS:That being said, there are a couple of joke options in the signature and the "god speed" section I inserted when I first made this, but those are set to appear really infrequently, and I don't really think we need a whole ton of those. --Purple George!YossieSpring in Fialta 07:20, 5 February 2009 (EST)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support