Help talk:References
No fair - this was going to be my next. Keep»»» going ««« 20:53, 12 August 2007 (CDT)
- Sorry. But there's about 10 others you could create if you wanted to. And it's still your project. And feel free to edit it. What do you think of it?ThunderkatzHo! 20:59, 12 August 2007 (CDT)
Probably better than I could have done, I's only kidding - it is a wiki after all. Im really suffering with that purple people eater- took 3 minutes to load this page!!! Keep»»» going ««« 21:11, 12 August 2007 (CDT)
[edit] Unsourced statements.
I have deleted a small part which talks about reasons for inserting a "fact" tag. It refers to authors putting fact tags in articles they write themselves "if you're not sure of (the facts) yourself". I have added a comment stating that the original author is responsible for "putting up or shutting up" if a fact tag is added. I rather think it's bad practice to encourage authors to put fact tags in their own articles for others to prove or not. What do we think? --Bob's your unkle 04:05, 12 September 2007 (MDT)
- OK, think it wos me wot dun it - my bad! SusanG 06:34, 12 September 2007 (MDT)
- Lets' see what the consensus is. The above is just my opinion.--Bob's your uncle 06:43, 12 September 2007 (MDT)
[edit] Named refs
At some point, this should include references with a name, so that you can use the same citation more than once. If I have time later in the day, I'll try to include this. VirileSterileblah, blah, blah 07:11, 12 September 2007 (MDT) Done. VirileSterileblah, blah, blah 18:11, 12 September 2007 (MDT)