Campaign!

G'day, fellow RationalWikians! Don't forget to visit the Campaign page of the 2016 Board of trustees election in order to make your voice heard. Suggested activities include:

  • Endorsing select candidates (lending a hand to your loyal henchmen and/or glorious overlords!)
  • Anti-endorsing select candidates (character-assassinating your hated opponents!)
  • Providing moar goat (please wipe afterwards)
  • Just asking questions to the candidates

Your participation might help other users better direct their votes. More importantly, it'll show the world that we've yet to go full Citizendium in terms of election hype!

from FuzzyCatPotato (Talk), group Site wide (urgent) at 00:24, 25 July 2016

Homo rudolfensis

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Rudy.
We're all homos here

Evolution

Icon evolution.svg
Relevant Hominidae
A Gradual Science
Plain Monkey Business

Homo rudolfensis is a true transitional form linking australopithecines and humans dating from 1.8 million years ago or earlier. Very primitive stone tools have been found contemporary with H. rudolfensis but we cannot prove which species made them.

Contents

[edit] Morphology

H. rudolfensis may have been a type of australopithecine with a larger brain, [1][2] the exact point of transition between Australopithecus and Homo is inevitably arbitrary. H. rudolfensis had a larger brain than Homo habilis [3] and some development of Broca’s area, later associated with speech though we do not know whether H. rudolfensis could talk. Furthermore the areas of the brain which modern humans use for logical thinking, future planning and decision making were developed in H. rudolfensis. It was taller than a typical australopithecine, about as tall as modern humans.[4][5]

[edit] Homo habilis and rudolfensis compared

Homo rudolfensis is very similar to Homo habilis and some scientists see H. rudolfensis as a type of H. habilis. One may have been the male and the other the female. [6] Comparing patterns of dental wear for H. rudolfensis and H. habilis suggest the two had different diets and may indicate different species. [7] Recent fossil finds suggest that Homo rudolfensis was a distinct species and not a different type of Homo habilis. [8]

[edit] See also

[edit] Footnotes

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools