James Oberg

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

James "Jim" Oberg (born 1944) is a US space journalist and historian. He's also a pain in the ass for UFO believers[1][2] and space conspiracy theorists. He's also a Fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.[3]

James Oberg is a former NASA contract engineer who is widely recognized as one of the leading Western authorities on the history of the Soviet space program[4] and an expert on orbital rendezvous techniques. He's worked in the trenches at NASA as an engineer (Johnson Space Center in Houston 1975-1997)[5] but he has a talent for bringing his area of expertise to the masses. He's big, friendly, engaging, and surprisingly telegenic for an engineer in his sixties. He speaks English, French, and Russian and has used his language skills and friendly demeanor to gain access to the heart of the Russian and European space establishments. He has given testimony before Congress.[6] He appears on PBS,[7] cable news,[8] and the Discovery Channel. He writes for a wide range of publications about space engineering.

Oberg is probably best known for authoring Red Star in Orbit (ISBN 0394514297), a history of the Soviet space effort up until 1981. In 1991, PBS transformed his book in a documentary series. HBO optioned Red Star in Orbit at some point for some future made-for-TV miniseries.

What's fascinating about Oberg is his involvement as a skeptic in the world of UFO nuts. For years he was a regular haunt on newsgroups like alt.alien.visitor. With humor and a vast store of knowledge he takes on the "they're up there!" UFO crowd. It's quite a joy to watch the wild eyed UFO nuts accusing Oberg of being a NASA/CIA stooge, falsely attributing quotes to him, and generally just raging at someone who not only doesn't share their point of view but does not share it based on a sound body of historical and technical knowledge they lack. The man has patience. He seems to best the UFO fringe time and time again. It's a joy to watch.

In 2002, after the 2001 Fox special rekindled the moon landing hoax conspiracy theory, NASA's history office offered him a contract and $15,000[9] to write a book debunking it. After some unfavorable news coverage in a politically delicate moment (just before the 2002 Senate and House elections), NASA higher-ups decided to drop the project.

[edit] External links

[edit] Footnotes

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support