Information icon.svg Please vote in the 2017 board of trustees election. The cabal thanks you for your service.
Bronze-level article

James Randi

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
James Randi, looking rather bored (probably due to a lack of effort from people after his challenge's money).
This might be
Skepticism
Icon skepticism.svg
But we're not sure
Who's asking?
The Atheist's Guide To
Atheism
Icon atheism.svg
Key concepts
More about atheism
Notable atheists
We may disagree with Randi on certain points, but we ignore him at our peril.
Carl Sagan[1]

James "The Amazing" Randi (born 1928) is a former stage magician and a scientific skeptic perhaps best known as a challenger of paranormal claims and pseudoscience. He is the founder of the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF).

The foundation sponsors a challenge offering a prize of US $1,000,000 to anyone who can demonstrate evidence of any paranormal, supernatural or occult power or event. The prize has yet to be claimed. No one has ever produced any actual evidence for faith-healing, telepathy, psionics, dowsing, precognative psychic friends with astral bodies, past life remembrance, or spectral manifestations of any kind.

In 1987 he exposed the Peter Popoff ministry for faking their faith healing claims. The resulting scandal drove Popoff into bankruptcy.[2]

He is also claimed as an enthusiastic member of the Brights Movement. Randi has received numerous awards and recognitions, including a Fellowship from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation in 1986.

He also performed on stage both as a mad dentist and as an executioner during Alice Cooper's 1973–1974 Billion Dollar Babies tour. He also built several of the stage props, including the guillotine.

James Randi Educational Foundation[edit]

I regard Randi as a national treasure, and perhaps one of the remaining antidotes that may prevent the rotting of the American mind.
Arthur C. Clarke[1]

Randi started the James Randi Educational Foundation to monitor applications for the $1 million prize, and to serve as an organizing body to help promote skepticism and provide educational resources on claims of the paranormal.[3]

The foundation was headed by James Randi for many years before he retired from its presidency. From August 2008[4] to December 2009[5] astronomer, blogger, and pseudoscience debunker Phil Plait ran the organisation. Plait has been succeeded by D.J. Grothe, formerly of the Center for Inquiry. In 2013, former Foundation employee Carrie Poppy accused D.J. Grothe and to some extent, the entire Foundation of sexism and dishonesty and specifically of failing to heed women's warnings about potential threats. Ms. Poppy herself claims to have been assaulted at a Foundation event. [6]. Several noted female skeptics have suggested that though no formal charges have been brought, either in the criminal or civil system, given the problems that the skeptical community has had with women, the Foundation would be wise to address the accusations before the silence itself becomes a bigger "scandal".[7]

Against homeopathy[edit]

See the main article on this topic: Homeopathy

James Randi strongly opposes the pseudoscience of homeopathy.[8] Homeopathy is water "with memory." Randi has testified before Congress as to the fakery and lies of homeopathy. Randi has lectured across the nation and made several videos and blogs educating the public about the uselessness of homeopathy (apart from removing that bulge in people's pocket books). Randi has promoted the 10:23 challenge, in which people across the world would purchase homeopathic "products" (we will not give them the credit of calling them medicines) and purposely overdose on them. No one has ever died from the 10:23 challenge, and that is the point. Overdosing on homeopathic pills is near impossible. Why? Because there is no medicine in them, and that is what the 10:23 challenge is all about: to educate the world what is in these products and how ineffective they are.

Million-dollar challenge[edit]

Paranormal phenomena have a habit of going away whenever they are tested under rigorous conditions. This is why the $1,000,000 reward of James Randi, offered to anyone who can demonstrate a paranormal effect under proper scientific controls, is safe.
Richard Dawkins[1]

The million-dollar challenge is a prize offered by the James Randi foundation to anyone "who can show, under proper observing conditions, evidence of any paranormal, supernatural, or occult power or event."[9]

Unsurprisingly, it has yet to be won though there have been a vast number of attempts.[10]

When challenged in 2011 Sally Morgan did not even attempt the challenge.[11]

After Randi's retirement in 2015, the JREF board decided to temporarily discontinue the challenge, pending a revision of the preliminary testing protocol. They expected to have the protocols ready in early 2016, but as of August 2016, the challenge is still on ice. In the meantime, the challenge remains open for any established psychics.[12]

Sylvia Browne's attempt[edit]

See the main article on this topic: Sylvia Browne

The James Randi Foundation offer of $1,000,000 prize to anyone who could prove any supernatural power has attracted many amateurs. However, Sylvia Browne is the only widely known psychic who has offered to take up the challenge.[13] Sylvia was a popular television psychic (who was made famous when she began to appear as a frequent guest on The Montel Williams show) who claimed that she could communicate with the dead. On March 6, 2001, she agreed to take up the challenge.

On the Larry King Live show, Browne stated that she would take up Randi's challenge (that was on September 3, 2001)[14]. To her dying day she did not take the challenge. Sylvia's first excuse was because she did not know how to contact Randi. That is comical: a professional psychic who speaks to dead people cannot figure out how to reach Randi. Her following excuse was that she did not want to take the challenge because Randi is a godless individual—all the more reason to take the challenge, Sylvia. If the supernatural could be proven and demonstrated, and the $1,000,000 were claimed, it would be a tremendous blow to Randi and the skeptical and atheist community. Sylvia Browne was special because she was the only professional psychic to accept Randi's challenge, though she later backed off.

The dark side of Randi[edit]

See the main article on this topic: Inverse stopped clock

Randi's challenge and life-long fight against the charlatans of the world has made him a target for a wide range of kooks, particularly on the Internet, claiming that they have demonstrated supernatural abilities and that he therefore owes them money, but that Randi has cheated them out of it in various ways, and so on. Being attacked by crazy assholes is one of the standard work hazards of being a loud and proud rationalist in our current society, as we here at RationalWiki know all too well.

That being said however, that doesn't mean that the great Randi is somehow infallible. For one thing, Randi is an overt supporter of both social Darwinism and of actual eugenics, combining the callousness of vulgar libertarianism with calls for (somebody; presumably the government) quarantining and re-educating, en masse, those of our fellow human beings that are judged not to be of good enough stock to be allowed to reproduce, e.g. in order that they don't spread their insufficient IQ's.

In an interview conducted by journalist and author Will Storr at the 2013 The Amaz!ng MeetingWikipedia's W.svg in Las Vegas, the following exchange took place between the two — statements which Storr recalls "left him quietly stunned":[15]

I quote some of [Randi's] comments that have concerned me, about his wish for drugs to be legalised so that users will kill themselves. But, to my surprise, he does not dismiss them. Not even slightly.
"I think exactly the same thing about smoking," he says. "They should be allowed to smoke themselves to death and die."
"These are quite extreme views," I say.
"I don't think so."
"But it's social Darwinism."
"The survival of the fittest, yes," he says, approvingly. "The strong survive."
"But this is the foundation of Fascism."
"Oh yes, yes," he says, perfectly satisfied. "It could be inferred that way, yes. I think people should be allowed to do themselves in."
"These are very right-wing views."
"I don't look at them that way," he says. "I'm a believer in social Darwinism. Not in every case. I would do anything to stop a twelve-year-old-kid from doing it. Sincerely. But in general, I think that Darwinism, survival of the fittest, should be allowed to act itself out. As long as it doesn't interfere with me and other sensible rational people who could be affected by it. Innocent people, in other words. These are not innocent people. These are stupid people. And if they can't survive, they don't have the IQ, don't have the thinking power to be able to survive, it's unfortunate; I would hate to see it happen, but at the same time, it would clear the air. We would be free from a lot of the plagues that we presently suffer from. I think that people with mental aberrations who have family histories of inherited diseases and such, that something should be done to seriously educate them to prevent them from procreating. I think they should be gathered in a suitable place and have it demonstrated for them what their procreation would mean for the human race. It would be very harmful. But I don't see any attempt to do that because everyone has the right to do stupid things. And I suppose they do," he concedes. "To a certain extent."

Global warming flap[edit]

In another notable case of a skeptic being unskeptical, Randi caused a tempest in a teacup by mouthing off about global warming on his blog. His sins included citing the Oregon Petition and pulling the "science was wrong before" gambit.[16][17] Randi retracted his earlier comments and included a link to eSkeptic's debunking of the Petition.[18]

Publications[edit]

  • The Truth About Uri Geller
  • The Faith Healers
  • Flim-Flam!
  • An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural

See also[edit]

External links[edit]

References[edit]