Kermit Gosnell

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
One of many articles on

Abortion

Icon hanger.svg
Medically approved
In the back alley

Kermit Barron Gosnell (born February 9, 1941) was an abortion "doctor" in a way somewhere between how Timothy McVeigh was an architect and how that same man was a licensed demolisher. He was convicted of numerous heinous crimes against women and children.[1]

The case also highlights the impending disaster for abortion rights and safety of women's healthcare should the GOP keep up the shit they have been pulling since Obama got elected.[2]

Contents

[edit] Accusations and trial

Gosnell was brought to trial in March of 2013, accused of many gruesome acts, including murdering several babies born outside of the womb, usually by severing their spines post-birth, and murdering a woman in his care.

There were concerns that his facility was unsanitary, as his office was reportedly often covered in blood and he gave women venereal diseases through improperly cleaned tools. Additionally, he reportedly used dangerous drugs and routinely performed horribly dangerous actions such as "accidentally" severing a women's cervix and colon.[3] Further reports include the presence of cats in the operating theaters and under-trained staffers.

A fuller list of the charges against him can be found in the grand jury's statement.[4] Gosnell's clinic (if we are going to call it that) itself was not being investigated for medical malpractice when this catastrophe was uncovered; rather, the execution of a warrant related to illegal drug sales indadvertedly led the authorities to a pile of dead bodies.[5]

[edit] Concerns and spin

As the story gained more notoriety, several troubling implications were brought to light. Predictably, the pro-life side of the argument banged on about how abortion needed to be stopped.[6] Sarah Palin joined in as well, posting a long diatribe on her Facebook.[7]

However, just as troubling as the right's knee jerk reactions are the questions of media conduct and of medical professionalism. Several news publications questioned why the event had not received major media coverage until activists started to push for it to gain greater notoriety.[8][3] Additionally, major concerns have been raised about regulation of abortion clinics in the wake of disaster and another video whose release was most likely timed to coincide with the trial.[9] This is especially concerning given that Gosnell's practice was not inspected in seventeen years.

[edit] The convicted's own beliefs

Somewhat strangely for a person whom the jury proclaimed to be a "racketeer", Gosnell himself supports the kind of proper-abortion-clinic availability that would have made his "clinic" lose business.[10]

[edit] Footnotes

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support