Lewis Trilemma
From RationalWiki
| One of many articles on |
| Christianity |
| Random examples |
| Resources |
The Lewis Trilemma is a bullshit argument invented 1844 by preacher Mark Hopkins (published 1846 in Lectures on the Evidences of Christianity) and popularized by Christian apologist C.S. Lewis on BBC radio, hence the name of the trilemma. The argument is also known as "liar, lunatic, or Lord," referring to the three possible parts of the trilemma.
Contents |
[edit] Argument
| I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God. That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell.[1] You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronising nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to. ...Now it seems to me obvious that He was neither a lunatic nor a fiend: and consequently, however strange or terrifying or unlikely it may seem, I have to accept the view that He was and is God. |
This can be summed up as:
- Due to the law of non-contradiction, Jesus was either correct or incorrect in his claim of divinity. He also either believed or did not believe he was divine.
- Therefore, Jesus either:
- Believed he was God and was correct in his belief (Lord)
- Believed he was God and was incorrect (lunatic)
- Did not believe he was God and was correct (liar)
- Did not believe he was God and was incorrect (ignored)
- Jesus spoke out against liars, so he was not a liar.
- Jesus did not show any other signs of being deranged, being a great moral teacher, so he was not a lunatic.
- Therefore, Jesus was God.
[edit] Problems
The argument holds a few hidden premises beyond the classical laws of logic. These hidden premises include:
- Jesus existed in the first place, and the Gospels provide an accurate explanation of Jesus' life and teachings.
- Hypocrisy is impossible.
Both of these secret premises can be challenged, and the latter is simply refuted. Anyone with any non-zero amount of social activity[2] has tons of experience of hypocrisy in their lifetimes. Even young children can remember cases where they or someone else was hypocritical. The former premise already assumes the Gospel is accurate, meaning that the whole argument isn't even necessary due to Jesus' claim of divinity.
There are also more problems with the argument beyond these alone. Step 4 in the argument can be challenged, as Jesus may have had that one delusion of false belief of auto-divinity but was otherwise okay, much like how Issac Newton was an alchemist but otherwise made great contributions to science and mathematics. Due to the subjective nature of morality, one could disagree with the claim of Jesus being a great moral teacher.[3] In Lewis' specific version of the trilemma, it is not apparent as to how Jesus would not have been a great moral teacher simply because he falsely believe himself to be God and for no other reason. This blends with the above paragraph: Newton practiced the pseudoscience of alchemy, yet that did not make his contributions to actual science any less valuable.
[edit] Trivia
- Our fourth, ignored possibility of Jesus not knowing he is God, also shows up. It isn't enough to refute the trilemma (beyond turning it into a "tetralemma,"[4] and is little more than a trivium due to the confusing implications which nobody, theist or atheist has really explored in depth.
[edit] See also
[edit] Footnotes
- ↑ I.e., a liar.
- ↑ I.e., everybody over age three except for good ol' Jack, whose literature indicates he has not talked to any actual humans for years.
- ↑ Christian Morality: Hostile to the Individual and Society
- ↑ Just a dilemma with four conflicting possibilities, much like a trilemma has three or an ordinary dilemma two.