Campaign!

G'day, fellow RationalWikians! Don't forget to visit the Campaign page of the 2016 Board of trustees election in order to make your voice heard. Suggested activities include:

  • Endorsing select candidates (lending a hand to your loyal henchmen and/or glorious overlords!)
  • Anti-endorsing select candidates (character-assassinating your hated opponents!)
  • Providing moar goat (please wipe afterwards)
  • Just asking questions to the candidates

Your participation might help other users better direct their votes. More importantly, it'll show the world that we've yet to go full Citizendium in terms of election hype!

from FuzzyCatPotato (Talk), group Site wide (urgent) at 00:24, 25 July 2016

New Testament

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Light iron-age reading

The Bible

Icon bible.svg
Gabbin' with God
Analysis
Woo
Figures
The contradictions and illiteracies of the New Testament have filled up many books by eminent scholars, and have never been explained by any Christian authority except in the feeblest terms of "metaphor" and "a Christ of faith." This feebleness derives from the fact that until recently, Christians could simply burn or silence anybody who asked any inconvenient questions.
Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything[1]

The New Testament refers to the canonical Christian texts that were written after the death of Jesus. They consist of four (sometimes conflicting or divergent) accounts of the life of Jesus; the doings of his disciples after the resurrection; and the letters of itinerant preacher Paul to early Christian Churches. Paul interestingly manages to demonstrate the rare skill of totally changing his literary style for some 6 of those letters; six letters that oddly support Church dogma that did not yet exist, and would not for another 50-100 years. What a clever man. Harold Bloom considers it a great work of literature and considers Jesus one of the greatest literary characters every invented. Many scholars do not believe those that wrote it had ever met any historical Jesus, or that the character of Jesus is closely based on the historical Jesus or any other real person. Incidentally the New Testament was originally written in Greek while people close to events in first century Judea would more likely have used Aramaic or Hebrew. Muslims believe that the New Testament was superseded by the Final Testament, which they also call the Qur'an.[2]

Contents

[edit] Canonization

The simple fact is that the New Testament, as we know it, is a helter-skelter accumulation of more or less discordant documents, some of them probably of respectable origin but others palpably apocryphal, and that most of them, the good along with the bad, show unmistakable signs of having been tampered with.
H. L. Mencken, Treatise on the Gods

The dictionary definition of "canon" is "an authoritative list of accepted books."

Ever since the first Christian texts were completed, bishops and other church officials have voiced their opinions about which texts merited inclusion in the New Testament, the opinion generally being a reflection of one's theological outlook. Gradually Bibles were assembled by tradition, and occasionally by decree, most from similar lists of accepted books.

The Western New Testament Canon was finally ratified by the Pope in 1443 and made an unconditional article of faith in 1546, although to this day there are significant Eastern canons that differ.

[edit] Books of the New Testament

[edit] Gospels

[edit] Acts

[edit] Pauline epistles

[edit] General epistles

[edit] Revelation

[edit] See also

[edit] External links


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools