Campaign!

G'day, fellow RationalWikians! Don't forget to visit the Campaign page of the 2016 Board of trustees election in order to make your voice heard. Suggested activities include:

  • Endorsing select candidates (lending a hand to your loyal henchmen and/or glorious overlords!)
  • Anti-endorsing select candidates (character-assassinating your hated opponents!)
  • Providing moar goat (please wipe afterwards)
  • Just asking questions to the candidates

Your participation might help other users better direct their votes. More importantly, it'll show the world that we've yet to go full Citizendium in terms of election hype!

from FuzzyCatPotato (Talk), group Site wide (urgent) at 00:24, 25 July 2016

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc

From RationalWiki
(Redirected from Post hoc)
Jump to: navigation, search
An example observed in the wild
Part of the series on

Logic and rhetoric

Icon logic.svg
Key articles
General logic
Bad logic

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc is a Latin phrase for "after this, therefore, because of this." The term refers to a logical fallacy that because two events occurred in succession, the former event caused the latter event.[1][2]

In addressing a post hoc, ergo propter hoc argument, it is important to recognise that correlation does not equal causation.

Magical thinking is a form of post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy, in which superstitions are formed based on seeing patterns in a series of coincidences. For example, "these are my lucky trousers. Sometimes good things happen to me when I wear them."

Contents

[edit] Alternate names

  • assuming the cause
  • Faulty Causal Assumption
  • post hoc

[edit] Form of the argument

P1: X happened before Y.
P2: (unstated) Something which happens before something else must have caused it.
C1: Therefore, X caused Y.

[edit] Other examples

Many superstitions use this. For instance, a black cat crosses my path on the way to school. I then fail a test that day. If I used this fallacy, I may conclude I failed because of the black cat, while ignoring other factors as the amount of time I spent studying.

  • The rooster crows before sunrise, therefore the crowing rooster causes the sun to rise.
  • The drunk scientist conducts an experiment to see why he gets hangovers. He decides to keep a diary. Monday night, scotch and soda; Tuesday morning, hangover. Tuesday night, gin and soda; Wednesday morning, hangover. Wednesday night, vodka and soda; Thursday morning, hangover. Thursday night, rum and soda; Friday morning, hangover. On Friday night before going out for a drink, the drunk scientist has an epiphany. "Aha!" he says to himself, "I've got it! Soda causes hangovers!"

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] Footnotes

  1. Glenn, Cheryl; Loretta Gray. Hodges' Harbrace Handbook. 16th ed. Thomson: Boston, 2007: p. 480.
  2. The Fine Art of Baloney Detection, Carl Sagan
  3. Strange bedfellows.


Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools