RationalWiki:Chicken coop

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search


This page is automatically archived by Pibot
Archives for this talk page: Archive list

Shortcuts:

The chicken coop is for the avoidance, containment and resolution of cases of Headless Chicken Mode (HCM). Despite the name, this tends to be serious business.

This page can be used for reporting cases of administrative abuse (abuse of sysop or moderator abilities such as blocking, page deletion, or user rights management), general abuse (such as trolling, wandalism, and personal attacks), and conflicts which cannot be solved through normal talk page discussion (such as longstanding edit wars or article content disputes).

Please try to resolve conflicts with other editors directly through discussion on their user talk page before reporting them at the chicken coop. If you do report an editor's behaviour here, please leave a message on their talk page to alert them to this, so that they have a chance to discuss their actions here.

All editors are welcome to comment on the cases raised here, and to try to reach a consensus on any action to be taken. If no consensus can be reached, and the HCM seems to be escalating, moderators are expected to take some action. However, any serious or permanent solution, such as removal of rights or lengthy ban, requires a community vote here according to the guidelines laid out in our Community Standards.

Contents


[edit] Promotion and ban by Mikal

I think this was fairly uncalled for...

Vergeltung (talk) 05:29, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Also, add this. Considering the shit I have been through that you could never imagine, I have the same reaction as you do to being told that I am making up what I have. Vergeltung (talk) 05:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations: you've gotten to the point where, when blocked and demoted, lurking sysops will be highly reluctant to unblock you. I'd suggest you take a moment to think about how you could change that, but... Peter mqzp 05:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
I believe the policy is anyone who's not an active vandal... Vergeltung (talk) 05:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
It is? Peter mqzp 05:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
RationalWiki:Sysops anyone who isn't an obvious vandal Vergeltung (talk) 06:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Mikal is a waste of time with crummy judgment. You'll get over it. Peter's right. People are going to fix what needs fixing. Complaining on this page of all places is the last place to encourage that happen. The policy may be as you say in writing, but it's not a hard and fast rule and, whether I like it or not, newbies and strangers get treated badly here. Welcome. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 16:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Dude, this "newbie and stranger" is Inquisitor Ehrenstein, one of the few users worse than Mikal. Whatever happened to him, he prolly had it comin'. If I knew the way/I would take you home. 16:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
I don't understand what's happening then. Why did Sasha start a new account and why was it blocked? Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 17:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
You'll have to ask Mikal why he blocked him in the first place. I have been blocking his subsequent socks because he is playing the "victim" card and whining all over the wiki. If I knew the way/I would take you home. 18:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Eh. I don't care what went on in Mikal's head. I think i've come to understand Sasha better. I've at least changed my opinion now that I've seen him in action. He's weird and has problems with folkways here, although hardly as bad as others. But I think he's a good person, means well, and at least tries. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 19:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
You will get no justice here, OP. The best thing you can do is participate in an underground liberation movement. We take care of our own and lobby the powers that be. Rationalwiki is a great game, with powerful houses who exercise supreme control over their fiefdoms. The idea that you can petition the elite on this page and receive justice is laughable. Eventually we will create a true mobocracy but in the meantime you will need to work subversively within the system. Eventually, when our movement gains enough members we can declare ourselves openly, and seize power, exiling those who have wronged us in the past. MarcusCicero (talk) 16:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
prolly had it comin Warning Victim blaming! –Александр(а) Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 16:43, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
A "victim." Hilarious. I hope you get the necessary therapy and treatment to get over what must be a deeply-felt, tragic episode of butthurt. If I knew the way/I would take you home. 16:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
I just feel so moved that people dislike me so much. --MikallakiM 16:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
I like you, Mikal. :) — (talk to) [æn əˈmɛɹɪkən ˈnaiːɪlɪst] 19:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

I was ask by the OP specifically to come here. I have looked at the public log he posted, but I'm not entirely sure what I'm supposed to be looking for. Maybe I'm looking for the right thing, but I don't see any blocking of the OP, any too extreme blocking of other posters, or abusive changing of group membership. What exactly is the issue here?--Token Conservative (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

His feelings were hurt by Mikal's comment, I think?--ADtalkModerator 18:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Verg made an account and immediately went here. I have no idea what the hell his problem is.--Token Conservative (talk) 19:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Th. Bernhard

I think this is a bit excessive. Rote Armee Vergeltung (talk) 17:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

No, no it isn't. If I knew the way/I would take you home. 17:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
No. He's right. What I did was really wrong. I should never have unblocked MC.Th. BernhardDas Leben ist ein Prozeß, den man verliert, was man auch tut und wer man auch ist. 18:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Toolbox
support