Politics
Contents |
I was thinking about this with the Baader-Meinhof being Anarchist as opposed to Communist, since the two are supposed to support the same result with Communism favoring a lawful abolition of the established government, while Anarchism favored terrorist attacks that would result in intolerable brutality by the state in response. Based on this analysis, the Baader-Meinhof is Anarchist, not Communist. I'm also indifferent on Communism. I don't support it, but I think it could possibly work in some form, the same way basic Capitalism doesn't work. I also don't jump on the bandwagon with the closet Nazis and try to claim that Communism = NazisTM. –Meine Ehere heißt Toleranz (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 15:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Your word salad is totally incomprehensible. Hipocrite (talk) 15:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- "with Communism favoring a lawful abolition of the established government, " I didnt realize organized and violent revolution was lawful. --MikallakiM 16:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- The process was for the state to remove itself. –Meine Ehere heißt Toleranz (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 16:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- "with Communism favoring a lawful abolition of the established government, " I didnt realize organized and violent revolution was lawful. --MikallakiM 16:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
It looks like silly season has come round again in the land of Brownback, so be forewarned that Cre vs. Evo wasn't really dead there; it was just asleep.
The Good People of the Earth (and Ken Willard) vs. Evil Secular Science
Citizens for Objective Public Education: I do not think those words mean what you think they mean
And speaking of COPE honcho Jorge Fernandez, yes, Virginia, he does indeed have a YEC track record
--Archfiend (talk) 23:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)