RationalWiki talk:Monthly RW
From RationalWiki
But it's December now - does it 'update' at the start or end of the month? Peter talk, or type, or whatever... 06:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting idea.
narchist 10:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think we're big enough for it yet.
Liquid Blue 19:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Needs better editorial section. Тytalk 19:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- No reason why the mentions section can't be started though - we do get a few here and there. Peter talk, or type, or whatever... 19:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Needs better editorial section. Тytalk 19:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Au contrare. I think we're big enough for things to slide under the radar of users very easily. At that stage, we're big enough to benefit from this sort of digest. Although, that said, we perhaps don't have the scale to run it yet, as the people who write it would be, well, the same as the people who read it. We don't yet have the dynamic of content generators and content consumers that would make it otherwise.
theist 00:40, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think we're big enough for it yet.
[edit] Next level
Ought we move this to some sort of project page and start a society now that at least one part seems to be useful?
Acer Blue 01:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Is that Society with a capital S? And, for that matter, is it called the Obscure Goat Monthly or the Monthly RationalWikian? Peter Urist for Mod!(MW) 02:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, the Monthly RationalWikian Society for the upkeep of Obscure Goat Monthly, which is updated continuously but archived each month.
Acer Blue 02:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Doable, doable. What's the 'administrative report' supposed to have in it? Peter Urist for Mod!(MW) 02:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, the Monthly RationalWikian Society for the upkeep of Obscure Goat Monthly, which is updated continuously but archived each month.