RationalWiki talk:Monthly RW/Mentions
Does this page also include links or does the site actually need to be discussed in the article/post/whatever? Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 07:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure, but considering the small number at this point I'd go with both. Peter Urist for Mod! 07:30, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- What about encyclopedia entries from ie: Perv site #1 and Slightly less pervy site #2? Osaka Sun (talk) 07:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- You can't really date those so well... Maybe a misc section at the bottom? We're on quite a few wikis come to think of it. Peter Urist for Mod! 07:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- I personally wouldn't want to add anything from ED. Sam Tally-ho! 07:50, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- True, but we could simply NSFW mark it. Osaka Sun (talk) 07:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- I still find it too foul and offensive a site to even patron. Sam Tally-ho! 07:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- More or less so than Metapedia? Peter Urist for Mod! 07:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- To be honest, I've never really checked out Metapedia. I don't really plan to, either. Sam Tally-ho! 07:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- (EC) I do not think we should link to any Wiki pages at all. We can be less picky than Wikipedia, but we should stick to the more reputable or infamous blogs.
ListenerXTalkerX 08:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- That sounds vague enough for our purposes. Peter Urist for Mod! 08:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- ^^There's something oddly sinister about that phrase.
Radioactive Misanthrope 08:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- First thing that came into my mind was Emperor Palpatine. Osaka Sun (talk) 08:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- You people are very suspicious. What harm could I possibly do..? Peter Urist for Mod!(MW) 08:47, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- First thing that came into my mind was Emperor Palpatine. Osaka Sun (talk) 08:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- ^^There's something oddly sinister about that phrase.
- That sounds vague enough for our purposes. Peter Urist for Mod! 08:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- (EC) I do not think we should link to any Wiki pages at all. We can be less picky than Wikipedia, but we should stick to the more reputable or infamous blogs.
- To be honest, I've never really checked out Metapedia. I don't really plan to, either. Sam Tally-ho! 07:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- More or less so than Metapedia? Peter Urist for Mod! 07:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- I still find it too foul and offensive a site to even patron. Sam Tally-ho! 07:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- True, but we could simply NSFW mark it. Osaka Sun (talk) 07:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- I personally wouldn't want to add anything from ED. Sam Tally-ho! 07:50, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- You can't really date those so well... Maybe a misc section at the bottom? We're on quite a few wikis come to think of it. Peter Urist for Mod! 07:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- What about encyclopedia entries from ie: Perv site #1 and Slightly less pervy site #2? Osaka Sun (talk) 07:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] WIGO-style voting?
I think we may like?
Liquid Blue 03:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Abuz Zubair.
"RationalWiki is maintained by 14 to 24 year old biased hipster atheist. Written in a patronizing and narcissistic tone their menial site gets barely any attention, so they have to seek it by being provocative in the hopes that someone will be offended enough to actually care. This is not an insult, nor am I trying to degrade anyone, it is just a fact.
Whoever gets their facts from a website like that, whether Muslim or not, isn't deserving a morsel of anyones time anyway. Besides, what would you sue them for? These are teenagers whose belongings range from dirty socks to twilight posters. Good luck brother."
Classic. P-Foster Talk "Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing." 04:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- I am a 14 to 24 year old hipster atheist who owns both dirty socks and Twilight posters.
Liquid Blue 04:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Colorado State Militias
Just love their Primary Widget Area. :) PongoOrangutans are sceptical 21:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Why Are You Atheists So Angry? 99 Things That Piss Off the Godless
Did you know that we are mentioned in the resource back section (there is a lot of 'resources for freethinkers' material) of Greta Christina's book? I bought it a few days ago, but I don't know how to list it. Would it be listed by when the book was published? ±
KnightOfTL;DRlongissimus non legeri 03:28, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, put it under March (according to Amazon), or whenever the paperback was published. Peter Subsisting on honey 03:41, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
[edit] On someone's Twitter profile
"Y R There Monkeys???" aka @TakeThatDarwin has How come there are still monkeys? on their Twitter profile. Scream!! (talk) 01:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)