RationalWiki talk:To do list
This page is not locked.
The editing tabs have been removed to discourage people from editing the main page rather than the sub-pages. Click here to edit the main page. |
Contents |
[edit] The Frankenstein Complex
I don't have any access to the main page which is kind of silly considering it's supposed to be a place to give suggestions but I think an article on the Frankenstein Complex would be a good idea.
[edit] Why am I on the "Who would you like to see less of on Rationalwiki?" poll?
Is it a joke? Or am I upsetting people?--ZeroIsLogic (talk) 22:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Go into the edit tab and look at the code. Therein lies your answer. - Grant (Talk) 22:57, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- That would be a good tip, if there was an edit tab. At least, I don't see one. I see little edit links next to most of the sections, but not for the poll, and I don't see the edit tab.--ZeroIsLogic (talk) 23:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Because you're kind of a dick. TeenageWasteland (talk) 23:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Well I'm sorry then.--ZeroIsLogic (talk) 23:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- You could also find the same information in the page source (on Chrome: view-source:http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:To_do_list). The key in this case is '<span class="myName">Anonymous user</span>'. In case that doesn't make it clear, I'll just say: Anonymous user is a prick. You can use the edit link on this talk page to see what I did there. - Grant (Talk) 23:23, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Well I'm sorry then.--ZeroIsLogic (talk) 23:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Because you're kind of a dick. TeenageWasteland (talk) 23:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- That would be a good tip, if there was an edit tab. At least, I don't see one. I see little edit links next to most of the sections, but not for the poll, and I don't see the edit tab.--ZeroIsLogic (talk) 23:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
For next time, HERE is the link to the poll page, complete with edit tabs. And I don't really think you're a dick. TeenageWasteland (talk) 23:27, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- I know that feel, bro. I have the slightest suspicions that Powder's rosen from the grave out of sheer hatred for me.--Madman (talk) 23:29, 28 March 2014 (UTC)The Madman
- Okay. And for anyone who thinks I am, please talk to me on my talk page. I must be doing something wrong, because I thought I had been very polite to everyone here.--ZeroIsLogic (talk) 23:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Did you check my comment when you made your edit? I think you'll find you've made some mistaken assumptions. The truth is far less nefarious. :) - Grant (Talk) 23:40, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Try logging out and looking at the poll. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 23:41, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- I just got it. I feel stupid now haha.--ZeroIsLogic (talk) 23:52, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Try logging out and looking at the poll. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 23:41, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Did you check my comment when you made your edit? I think you'll find you've made some mistaken assumptions. The truth is far less nefarious. :) - Grant (Talk) 23:40, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Okay. And for anyone who thinks I am, please talk to me on my talk page. I must be doing something wrong, because I thought I had been very polite to everyone here.--ZeroIsLogic (talk) 23:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
[edit] Genetics of race
Just started a page on Genetics of Race over at my userspace. Still working on it (obviously), and any help, assistance, or hell, complete rewrites, would be greatly appreciated. The Mad World (talk) 15:06, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Isn't it already covered in our race article and related subjects like racial realism? Wéáśéĺóíď
Methinks it is a Weasel 15:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- This is actually a contentious section of racial realism as we speak - David Gerard (talk) 13:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
[edit] hyperphysics
Hello, i recently became aware of a website called hyperphysics. It's hosted by Georgia state University, and is run by Rod Nave. At first glance it seems to be an education resource. My problem is the creationist slant of the site. False claims made include: DNA is a true code, and that amino acid selection during protein synthesis is not chemically determined http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/organic/gencode.html#c1
Other pages directly relate to god, and creationism. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Nave-html/faithpathh/oldearth.html
I hope you (or someone you know) can expose this site as a stealth creationist deception. — Unsigned, by: 71.17.35.246 / talk / contribs 06:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- i do see an issue here we should do something but I am no means the person to do it ask some of the main editors Bubba41102 (talk) 02:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Added to to-do list - David Gerard (talk) 20:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- I never knew that; I'd only come across it while reading on acoustics, and there wasn't much mention of God in that, of course. Wasn't much help, God or no, but sad to hear that the rest is sketchy. PacWalker 08:33, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
[edit] Andrew Wakeman fixing
I have gained interest in the Andrew Wakeman article and would like others opinions on what needs to be fixed before going off messing about with the article, any ideas? Bubba41102 (talk) 02:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Do you mean Andrew Wakefield? First thing to do would put your proposed fixes (if substantial) on the talk page. If not substantial, hit "edit" and go for it, worst that could happen is they get reverted :-) - David Gerard (talk) 20:25, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- yeah sorry for some reason I thought of that Bubba41102 (talk) 19:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
[edit] Some weird diet fad from a year ago
Some idiots from about a year ago decided it would be a great idea to ingest clay and then let it expand in your stomach in order to loose weight ( not to be confused with colonic this does work but it definetly isn't safe it is comparable to the low-carb diet in that respect but it is stupid and definetly isn't safe you can read on one persons exploit here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2707663/The-women-drinking-CLAY-lose-weight-It-s-used-cat-litter-contain-arsenic-lead-heart-attacks-Is-riskiest-dieting-craze-ever.html (sorry for long link) this does fall in the mission statement, but I can't edit the to do list Bubba41102 (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Update: I was able to add it so don't mind this, but feel free to discuss the idea, but nvm the needing to be added. Bubba41102 (talk) 21:36, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
[edit] Just a Question
I just wanted to know how do we add suggestions to the list? Also, is it oldest or newest ones at the top? Nergali (talk) 17:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)