Help us beat last year's record of $7100!
|Goal: $7,200||Donations so far: $618.25|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate today!
|Hail to the Chief?|
|Persons of interest|
The phrase "reality-based community" first appeared in a October 17, 2004 New York Times article by Ron Suskind titled, "Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush."
It was apparently meant to be a derisive term, and was used by a member of the Bush administration to refer to the community of people who did not buy into the notion that Bush and his team were able to create their own reality. Unsurprisingly, the term was instantly embraced by its intended targets as a badge of honor who began to describe themselves with the phrase "a proud member of the reality-based community."
The full quote is:
“”The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors ... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
|—Unnamed White House aide|
Apart from the introduction of the phrase "reality-based community," the quote is also interesting in that it highlights the fact that the kind of people with whom the reality-based community is being contrasted — messianists who believe themselves to be on a mission from God — do not believe that "solutions emerge from (the) judicious study of discernible reality."
- ↑ Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush, New York Times, 17 October, 2004
- ↑ Karl Rove quotes
- ↑ "Words in a Time of War: Taking the Measure of the First Rhetoric-Major President," Mark Danner. May 10, 2007
- ↑ A humanities professor at an R1 university in the American South considers the aide's use of postmodern anti-foundationalism and admission of hegemony not only ironic, but also entertaining.