Robert L. Park

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Robert L. Park.
This might be

Skepticism

Icon skepticism.svg
But we're not sure
Who's asking?

Robert L. (Bob) Park (born 1931) is an emeritus professor of physics at the University of Maryland, former Director of Public Information at the Washington office of the American Physical Society, author of popular science articles and books and all-round good egg. He maintains a weekly column and mailing list called what's new in which he discusses recent mainly scientific developments. He is a Fellow of the American Physical Society, the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the American Vacuum Society and has spoken at TAM, which of course trumps all of the aforementioned.

The infobox on his Wikipedia article says: Known for: Criticism of pseudoscience. Spot on. He is also outspoken on the misrepresentation of science by the media, the general level of scientific illiteracy in the media, the blithering idiocy of much "science" coverage in the aforementioned media, and politics. Especially the killingoff of the Office of Technology Assessment (by frauds who hated the fact it showed they were frauds) and the creation of NCCAM (by frauds who wanted to appear less like frauds).

His book Voodoo Science: The road from foolishness to fraud is an essential item in the Skeptic's library. It defines and discusses the related but different concepts of pathological science, junk science and pseudoscience. With examples. Oh, and fraudulent science, too, which is sort of like junk science only worse (see Burzynski Clinic). The term voodoo science is by now popularly identified primarily with Park and his book, which deals killer blows to such cherished institutions as homeopathy, ufology, free energy and telepathy.

In a 2003 article "Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science" which are[1]:

  1. The discoverer pitches the claim directly to the media.
  2. The discoverer says that a powerful establishment is trying to suppress his or her work.
  3. The scientific effect involved is always at the very limit of detection
  4. Evidence for a discovery is anecdotal.
  5. The discoverer says a belief is credible because it has endured for centuries.
  6. The discoverer has worked in isolation.
  7. The discoverer must propose new laws of nature to explain an observation.

Recent issues of What's New have focused on radiation woo, discussing Fukushima, electrosensitivity and the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation (with some excellent snarks aimed at credulous fools who do not understand this).

[edit] References

[edit] References

  • bobpark.org, the refreshingly clunky-looking "What's New" column
  • Park, Robert L. (2002). Voodoo science: the road from foolishness to fraud. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-860443-2.
  • Park, Robert L. (2010). Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-14597-0.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools