|Part of the series on|
“”Shoehorning is the process of force-fitting some current affair into one's personal, political, or religious agenda. So-called psychics frequently shoehorn events to fit vague statements they made in the past. This is an extremely safe procedure, since they can't be proven wrong and many people aren't aware of how easy it is to make something look like confirmation of a claim after the fact, especially if you give them wide latitude in making the shoe fit. It is common, for example, for the defenders of such things as the Bible Code or the "prophecies" of Nostradamus to shoehorn events to the texts rather than truly predict anything.
|—The Skeptic's Dictionary|
Shoehorning is the process of using evidence or events to support a personal agenda, even if
wearing overly thick socks the data do not support the conclusion that's been drawn. The process is often forceful, requiring either a very loose use of the facts and definitions or intentionally hiding, selectively reporting, or cherry picking certain aspects of a fact. Often, the most blatant examples involve using evidence to support a crank theory and then, should that evidence prove later to be erroneous, using the converse to also support the exact same crank theory.
 A lesson in shoehorning
Shoehorning is a fun and rewarding hobby. The following steps can be used to predict anything that has happened in the past:
- Choose a major historical event, or a famous person
- Read a large book, ideally a vague and contradictory book, noting anything that could possibly be related to this person or event (no matter how vaguely)
- Ignore the literary and historical context of the text you're citing, and anything that doesn't support your assertion
- Make a very ugly website in order to share your insights with the world (professional loons recommend randomly coloured and sized text, and random line-breaks)
The prophecies of Nostradamus are hopelessly vague, although many can be related to events of his time. This is similar to the way in which verses from Revelation can be shoehorned in to current events, but understanding the historical context makes it easier to understand that the author was writing about their own time period. True believers will engage in the process of prophecy in reverse, by reading his quatrains to see if any could possibly correlate with an event that has already taken place. Robert T. Carroll of The Skeptic's Dictionary cites the following example:
"The year 1999 seven months From the sky will come the great King of Terror. To resuscitate the great king of the Mongols. Before and after Mars reigns by good luck. (X.72)"
Carroll found the following interpretation on an astrology website (now defunct):
|"Could the crash of John F. Kennedy Jr.'s airplane in July of 1999 fulfill the line "from the sky will come "the great King of Terror"? Could the human fear of death and bodily injury be the intended definition of "the great King of Terror"? It might be possible."|
The writer has taken the date, which does correlate with Kennedy's death, and then shoehorned the rest of the quatrain to fit their belief. As is common with shoehorning, they've ignored references that would contradict their claim. How are Mongols and Mars related to Kennedy's plane crash? One could argue that this quatrain predicts the Kargil conflict between India and Pakistan, since there were war planes involved in the fighting, and Mars is the Roman god of war. This is arguably more logical, yet this hypothetical Kargil prophecy still doesn't account for the Mongol reference. Another example is found in the frequently incorrect reading of the word "Hister", found in a Nostradamus quatrain, to be a reference to Adolf Hitler. Shoehorning of this quatrain is only possible if one doesn't know that Hister was the Latin name for the Danube River, thus not a reference to Adolf Hitler. However, in another great example of shoehorning, this can be reinterpreted as refering to Hitler because the Danube was near where Hitler was born.
Shoehorning is also practiced by psychics, who may make hundreds of predictions, and when one of them turns out to be true, they will cite it as evidence of their powers, while ignoring all the erroneous predictions.
 Punishment from God
Natural disasters are a rich source of shoehorning for religious lunatics. Taking the Asian Tsunami of 2004 as an example, here is a list of people who've linked this to God's plan.
- (Buddhist) Sri Lankan Buddhists speculated that the sea gods may have been angered by their politicians
- (Christian) A Salvation Army officer in Sri Lanka explained that their officers and clergy had their lives spared
- (Christian) Tina M. of Holy Love Ministries blamed abortion
- (Islam) Imams in Indonesia blame Muslims who are not correctly observing the requirements of Islam
- (Islam) Imam Muzammil Siddiqi, head of the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California, explained the Tsunami as being a test
- (Islam) Sheik Fawzan Al-Fawza claimed that God sent the tsunami to punish the fornicators, specifically those evil homosexuals
- (Islam) Saudi cleric Muhammad Al-Munajiid appears to be blaming Christmas parties
- (Judaism) Sephardic Chief rabbi Shlomo of Israel blamed our wrongdoing
This is a short summary, and few of them explain why God would punish people in such an arbitrary fashion? If we accept that he's annoyed with homosexuals, wouldn't San Francisco have been a better target? Far be it for us to tell God how to do his job, but the destruction of all the gay clubs in London by freak tornados would surely have sent a clearer message. Shoehorning works around awkward facts by ignoring them, or explaining disparities as being God's mysterious plan.
This is a fun little exercise. Just take the political views of old dead people whom everyone knows are good or bad: Thomas Jefferson good, Adolf Hitler bad. Next, shoehorn the good person's beliefs into your own modern political or religious beliefs. Shoehorn the beliefs of your political opponents into Hitler and Nazism.
Marxists are known for their ongoing attempts to shoehorn the whole of history into the framework of bourgeois-versus-proletarian class-struggle, in accordance with the dictum of Marx, "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." As Marxism has diversified into identity politics, a thousand different variants on this shoehorning are now practiced under the aegis of conflict theory, with racial, ethnic, and gender-based conflicts replacing the bourgeois-proletarian divide.
Demonizing political opponents by bringing up parallels to Hitler is so common that Godwin's Law has been coined in response.
Within the religious right it is common to try to shoehorn modern religious right views (many of which date only to the fundamentalist movement of the 1920s, or to televangelism of the 1970s and 1980s) into the Founding Fathers of the United States. See, for example, David Barton and W. Cleon Skousen. The religious right is by no means the only offender. Among the more ludicrous, hard green writer Christopher Manes (in his 1990 book Green Rage) devotes a chapter to shoehorning Thomas Jefferson together with radical environmentalism.
 Alternative medicine
Those arguing in favor of alternative medicine often cite examples of traditional medicines (such as willow bark) or derivatives thereof that were incorporated into mainstream medicine, and urge that people should keep an open mind about whatever remedy the practitioner happens to be promoting. For instance, in an article titled Anecdotal Evidence: The Basis of All Knowledge one homeopath says:
“”We learned that certain herbs had beneficial effects by trying them and passing on the information of what resulted: pure anecdotal evidence. But that’s how we know, for example, that milk thistle is good for the liver and hawthorn is good for the heart. No studies needed to be done. We learned through experience and anecdote.
This ignores, however, all the traditional treatments that were later scientifically shown to be ineffective, and that were also supported by anecdotal evidence. Over the course of history, countless remedies have been thought effective for virtually all diseases, and, obviously, this means that some of these indications will happen to be true just by chance. The author's two examples are cherry-picking, and certainly do not prove the validity of anecdotal evidence.
 See also
- The Bible Code
- Sovereign Press: An obscure but fascinating exercise in shoehorning to the extreme.
- ↑ http://www.skepdic.com/shoehorning.html
- ↑ The Rapture and World War III. Lunacy goes hand-in-hand with poor web design.
- ↑ The Skeptic's Dictionary entry for Nostradamus
- ↑ Explanation of Nostradumus' usage of the word Hister
- ↑ Nostradamus 101 - Hitler (Century 1, Quatrain 35)
- ↑ Wikipedia - Inn River, a tributary of the Danube. Hitler was born in Braunau am Inn. Also note that Pope Benedict XVI was also born on this river. We're saying nothing...
- ↑ Religioustolerance.org examines religious claims of the 2004 Tsunami being God's wrath
- ↑ A rebuttal to which has been written by Orac: A homeopath lectures scientists about anecdotal evidence