The starlight problem is a complication for Young Earth Creationism involving the amount of time it would take for light from distant stars to reach Earth. Because light travels at a finite speed, only stars within a few thousand light years of Earth should be visible in the creationist model of history. This is not the case though, since quasars currently 13 billion light years away have been detected, which, allowing for the metric expansion of space, puts the lower limit on the age of the universe near 13 billion years (light does not travel the distance ct in time t; this property originates from integrating local principles of special relativity over a curved manifold (i.e. space-time).
To solve the starlight problem, some creationists have proposed a change in the speed of light; this proposition became known as C-decay. The idea was first systematically advanced by creationist Barry Setterfield in his 1981 book The Velocity of Light and the Age of the Universe. Setterfield claimed that, at the date of creation, light traveled millions of times faster than it does today and has been decaying exponentially ever since. While sounding slightly reasonable, the idea proposed by Setterfield is fundamentally absurd and since its inception has been universally derided by scientists. The idea was supported into the late eighties by creationists whose claims became more and more bizarre in attempts to prop up their failing model, until it finally collapsed under the weight of the evidence against it. In 1988, the theory was given up by the major creationist organization Institute for Creation Research, which, in an attempt to distance themselves from the scientific debacle that C-decay had become, became vocal critics of it.
A change in the speed of light would quite literally end the world as we know it. The speed of light is not an arbitrary speed with no effect on outside systems, but is in fact a component in one of the most fundamental equations in the universe, the equation for matter: E=mc2 where E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. This means that any increase of the speed of light would in turn increase the amount of energy released by the reactions of matter. Because the Sun relies on the reactions of matter, most notably nuclear fusion, a change in the speed of light would alter its energy output; if light were traveling as fast as some creationists demand, then the energy output of the Sun could be expected to increase over 800,000,000 times.
 White hole cosmology
White hole cosmology is a creationist cosmology invented by creationist Russell Humphreys and put forward in his 1994 book Starlight and Time. The main idea of white hole cosmology is that the world was created inside a black hole and that earth was subjected to intense time dilation so billions of years could have passed outside the field while only a few days would pass inside it.
 Omphalos hypothesis
The Omphalos hypothesis or argument provides an unscientific and unfalsifiable explanation for the starlight problem. The argument relies on the logically weak argument goddidit by claiming that the starlight we see is not natural but was in fact created in transit by god.
Many creationists have rejected this explanation on theological grounds because it implies a purposely deceitful god.
But if you accept the hypothesis, it opens a big can of worms. One could proceed to reject the 9,900 years of time given by dendrochronology by saying extra tree-rings, over and above 4,004 BC, were not natural but were in fact created in situ by god.
most logical only possible explanation is as follows: Since god is a supernatural being, he could perfectly well have created photons with positions and velocities which are consistent with having been traveling from distant stars for many billions of years. This non-testable explanation could be used to escape any of the evidence against Young Earth Creationism, as there is no way to tell if the universe was brought into existence 6,000 years ago in a state consistent with a much older age or if the universe is in fact as old as science shows it to be.
However, if this were the case, then scientists would still have to treat the universe as though it were ancient and so the actual date of creation is irrelevant. For some creationists, the possibility of god being deliberately deceptive is uncomfortable. This solution also raises the problem of deciding when god created the apparently old universe - was it 6,000 years ago, or last Thursday?
 Anisotropic synchrony convention
Jason Lisle's 2010 paper published in the Answers Research Journal proposes to solve the starlight problem by taking advantage of a quirk of physics--it isn't certain, after 70 years of discussion, whether a "one way" speed of light can be measured or is a convention. Lisle thus proposes that light traveling towards the Earth does so at an infinite speed while light traveling the other way goes at half the speed; which is not original with him. Thus it becomes possible for light to arrive from distant stars in line with the 6000 year chronology of young Earth creationism but we still measure the speed of light as a fairly lumbering 299,792,458 m/s.
The problem with Lisle's proposal is that the one way speed of light would have to vary not only in one direction, but spherically, with Earth at the center. Under this scenario, general relativity predicts that an extra geocentric gravitational field would be generated. No such field has been discovered, and therefore Lisle is incorrect until such discovery is made.
 See also
- ↑ Four Quasars above Redshift 6 Discovered by the Canada-France High-z Quasar Survey
- ↑ See the Wikipedia article on metric expansion of space.
- ↑ The decay of d-decay
- ↑ WP:Mass–energy equivalence
- ↑ The Myth of c Decay
- ↑ The Unraveling of Starlight and Time
- ↑ I's not like the Judeo-Christian-Islamic god never lied before; see Genesis 18:12-13
- ↑ Quantum Non-Linearity - Answers in Genesis Screws It up Again