2016 Board discussion

A discussion on the future of the Rationalmedia Board has been started in the Bar in advance of the upcoming elections. Please give your input there (or wherever it may be moved).

from Paravant (Talk), group Site wide (urgent) at 05:34, 1 December 2015

Talk:2012 apocalypse

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Information icon.svg Cover Story Nominee
This article has been nominated, among others, for random inclusion on the Main Page.
Please discuss its nomination on the this talk page.
If it is accepted, its front-page abstract can be found here.
Icon pseudoscience green.svg

This pseudoscience related article has been awarded SILVER status for quality. We like it, and you should too!

This article is of MID importance to the wiki.

See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


This page is automatically archived by Pibot
Archives for this talk page: <1>


[edit] Potential 2013 appocalypse

When Benny made his announcement the Vatican was hit by lightning: how often does 'the collection of buildings' get struck?

Within a few days there was a low probability conjunction of a near miss 'middling meteorite' and also a meteor event.

Mount Etna is currently erupting.

There are various political scandals and claimed political scandals around.

Has anyone brought these together into an apocalypse prediction? (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Doomsday template

Several things: 1) the lower border is overlapping the white text. 2) how do we know the apocalypse has ended as opposed to still happening? Nothing seems to be really different since the start of it.

Please comment. K61824Who is Terry Koeckritz anyways? 14:32, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

[edit] The 2012 apocalypse actually happened

... but it was a #completely different planet# (possibly Golgafrincham and possibly due to a "mutant star goat." (talk) 15:09, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

[edit] The world is so stupid that they haven't noticed that the world ended

We Americans are too complacent, we know the apocalypse happened but we continue worrying about our national dept, and the NSA. You don't need privacy in the apocalypse. Also, I've noticed that all news sources and world governments aren't acknowledging it. What are they trying to hide? Did they capture a solar flare? did the Mayans return and order something from the Taco Bell Volcano menu? Only time will tell.— Unsigned, by: Crustacean27 / talk / contribs

I would like to respond to this but unfortunately I don't understand it.--Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 18:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry, in what way do you not understand?Crustacean27 (talk) 01:36, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Cover article, again (sticky)

It's still a good article. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 20:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Personal tools