Talk:Alfred Webre

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Contents

[edit] Fuck MediaWiki and all its clones

I hate you so much citation templates. Тysic semper 19:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

'Ken oath - David Gerard (talk) 22:08, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Unadulterated crack

This sentence is actually in the Wikipedia article:

Webre has been a leading proponent of the events of September 11, 2001 as a false flag operation employing secret exotic technologies developed by DARPA and CIA including Tesla-based time travel that permitted Donald Rumsfeld to have images of the events at the World Trade Center on 9/11 30 years in advance in 1971.

That is all - David Gerard (talk) 22:08, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

[edit] RationalWiki is a tool for character assassination and disinformation

[edit] RationalWiki is a tool for character assassination and disinformation

Having spent time now attempting to revise Webre's bio, I can attest that RationalWiki is a tool for character assassination and disinformation. The sole purpose of this profile is character assassination of Webre, who is an outstanding and notable individual. The profile photo was uploaded in 2005 by Canadian Pierre Juneau, author of the original Wikipedia entry for Webre. — Unsigned, by: Spacecadet / talk / contribs

It would appear that Webre is doing a pretty good job at assassinating his own character. Omar (gibber) 18:00, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal

I see that a new editor wanted to add something about this. I see that WP has something on it but it seems rather dismissive although the WP Webre article makes a big deal of it. Anyone know much about it? Is it of interest to us?--Bob"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." 17:47, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure that any of this article is of interest to us. It seems to be mostly an outlet for some guy over at WP who is butthurt that they're about to axe the article on his boyfriend. P-Foster Talk "The existing superstructure has handed out crumbs. We don’t want crumbs; we want the whole loaf now.” --Ras Frank I 17:51, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
He's a crank of pretty impressive proportions, SpaceCadet looks like a supporter. Тyrannis 17:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Indeed. But my question was really about the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal. It looks like a group of guys who got together to agree with each other to me, but there might be more to it. --Bob"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." 17:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
support
Community
Tools