Talk:American Revolution
From RationalWiki
Um, I know this is nice and all, but it really lacks mission-centricism. ħuman
03:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know - it's politics and history etc. Fits fine from where I am sitting...in my office drinking wine. AceX-102 03:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, but P & H aren't our mission. What does this have that WP wouldn't have in spades? Cheers mate! Wait, isn't it a bit early to be hammering one on? ħuman
03:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- From Community Standards - RationalWiki is not a general encyclopedia; it does not require articles on every known subject. However, the wiki's mainspace welcomes many articles that do not relate to the primary missions of RationalWiki providing that they are factually accurate and of interest to the community at large. These include articles on general science, historical events and important individuals throughout the world.. AceX-102 03:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Well, dang, who wrote that shite? ħuman
04:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Needs more sources GiantMcChicken (talk) 04:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, dang, who wrote that shite? ħuman
- From Community Standards - RationalWiki is not a general encyclopedia; it does not require articles on every known subject. However, the wiki's mainspace welcomes many articles that do not relate to the primary missions of RationalWiki providing that they are factually accurate and of interest to the community at large. These include articles on general science, historical events and important individuals throughout the world.. AceX-102 03:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, but P & H aren't our mission. What does this have that WP wouldn't have in spades? Cheers mate! Wait, isn't it a bit early to be hammering one on? ħuman