Talk:Blood type diet
From RationalWiki
[edit] Criticism section?
Isn't the whole of RationalWiki supposed to be a criticism section? Totnesmartin 15:37, 24 February 2009 (EST)
- You make a good point. Hence I have renamed it in something more fitting to our SPOV.
pathetic 17:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Whee! 8 months question → response. Is this a record?
& marmitechat 17:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- All thanks to a batshit crazy BON...-- Antifly Merged with Infinity 18:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Possibly not a record, I think I may have replied to something over a year old.
pathetic 19:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Question: 25 July 2007 -> Response: 23 July 2009
pathetic 19:21, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Question: 25 July 2007 -> Response: 23 July 2009
- Possibly not a record, I think I may have replied to something over a year old.
- All thanks to a batshit crazy BON...-- Antifly Merged with Infinity 18:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- Whee! 8 months question → response. Is this a record?
[edit] Meaningless but harmless?
This obviously won't have much of a positive effect, but it seems to me that it wouldn't exactly hurt. Am I wrong on that? --—signed by Lilfut 21:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Looks fairly harmless, at least in moderation and dependent on general lifestyle. --ConcernedResident Fightin' round the world 21:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
[edit] What is interesting
Half the Dutch population is type O and are heavy vegetable, grain and diary eaters; the Dutch are also one of the tallest people in the world with an 105 IQ average. Clearly there diet is the correct one, and not one with heavier meat intake.