Talk:Cdesign proponentsists

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Actually I think this is slightly in error. This fascinating example of Creationist deceit didn't come up until after the trial was over. The trial certainly showed that the words had been substituted but the "Cdesign proponentsists" element didn't come out in the trail. At least I can't find it. I'll fix it unless anybody else has other ideas.--Bobbing up 04:55, 12 April 2008 (EDT)

I read somewhere they found it while examining the drafts but decided not to use it at trial. Barbara Forest I believe was the witness for the drafts of Pandas. 00:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

[edit] CP article

Calls the Kitzmiller decision "widely applauded." I'm surprised it's stayed up in its current state. Picon small.pngLiquid Blue 00:43, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

[edit] The Graph at the Top

Illustrates punctuated equilibrium quite well, I just noticed. CodeMaster9000 (talk) 23:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

[edit] CP as science

Cdesign proponentsism is also a name of a new popular philosophy/science which combines elements from ID and Atheism in a way that is self-consistent, unlike evolution. Should we include that? Eugene Willow (talk) (email) 18:42, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Link? SophieWilder 18:49, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately no link yet, as this is new theory. I am discussin it quite on talk.origins recently hovewer, so feel free to google "cdesign proponentsism". I will post more Info when i systematize it soon. Eugene Willow (talk) (email) 18:05, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
So what you want is for us to write up some vague concept you just invented? Whatever for? SophieWilder 18:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
I did run it through Google and the only real mention is on Eugene Willow's blog, but it's "protected" and can't be read anyway. So, yeah, looks like self-promotion. Scarlet A.pngtheistModerator 11:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support