Talk:Child support
[edit] Deletion
yesno? If anyone has something to say about this topic, you're welcome to make it an actual article. Otherwise User:Fall down will just keep socking up and splurging their bile on it, as is their wont. Not that deleting or writing an actual article will help, but either way it's better than just a . WazzaHello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me... 21:44, 12 December 2008 (EST)
- I put the "." so I could protect the article and prevent re-creation until Fall Down gets bored and goes away. You can't protect a blank page AFAIK...PFoster 21:52, 12 December 2008 (EST)
- I'm good with PF's idea, and if someone wants to kill it outright, I'm fine with that too. --Kels 21:56, 12 December 2008 (EST)
- Clearly childsupport is communist? JazzMan 23:34, 12 December 2008 (EST) KIDDING
- My favourite part of the troll's edit was how child support was a scam perpetrated by women "getting themselves pregnant." yeah, like the father didn't help with that a teensy bit. What an asshole. PFoster 23:39, 12 December 2008 (EST)
- Clearly childsupport is communist? JazzMan 23:34, 12 December 2008 (EST) KIDDING
[edit] Reverse racism?!
I recently removed the "reverse racism" link because I believe that it is not racist to say that the amount you are forced to pay is beyond your means. My dad, untill I went to college, had to pay my mother 250 dollars a month as per the court decision, doing so on a 28,000 dollar a year payroll. I do not think it is racist to complain about this and attempt to level the situation out. ĴαʊΆʃÇä₰ duuudddeee...
- Yeah, I know it's a bit of a stretch, but we don't have a men's right's article and I don't feel like writing one. And with all due respect to your old man--he should've thought about that before fathering a child. a grand every four months ain't a lot of money when you're raising a kid. PFoster 00:30, 13 December 2008 (EST)
- Sadly, those costs rack up much more rapidly, particually when you consider that my dad lives in an apartment over 20 miles away because of the insane restraining order my mum got, not to mention that my mom makes ~80,000 - 120,000 dollars a year... so for some odd reason, I favor my dad in this case. ĴαʊΆʃÇä₰ duuudddeee...
- Sorry that I have to log out again, time runs short on me, and finals are approaching. Be back later. ĴαʊΆʃÇä₰ duuudddeee...
- Sadly, those costs rack up much more rapidly, particually when you consider that my dad lives in an apartment over 20 miles away because of the insane restraining order my mum got, not to mention that my mom makes ~80,000 - 120,000 dollars a year... so for some odd reason, I favor my dad in this case. ĴαʊΆʃÇä₰ duuudddeee...
[edit] Protect?
Since it's a low-traffic page and we're all sysops? 'Til our friend gets bored? TheoryOfPractice 22:29, 16 January 2009 (EST)
- The day it came unlocked he was back. He has so little life he will sit there waiting for a page to come unlocked so he can vandalise it. We have two options 1) we keep it locked indefinitely (against current policy) or 2) we keep reverting his shit, which is less effort for us than it is for him to write it. - User
22:33, 16 January 2009 (EST)
- Makes sense. Your signature is too fucking big, btw. TheoryOfPractice 22:36, 16 January 2009 (EST)
- If you want to vent you can write Fun:RationalWikiWiki/Fall down. As for my signature when I first looked at the page your comment looked misplaced. - User
22:47, 16 January 2009 (EST)
- 1. Nopoint in protecting, it's more fun to revert and vandal bin the idiots. 2. Pi's sig is "mostly harmless" - I think only one if really "big", and, for myself, I like the math exercise in reading it. ħuman
22:51, 16 January 2009 (EST)
- Agreed on the no protecting. No big deal on the siggy, but I DO beg to differ on the size...TheoryOfPractice 22:54, 16 January 2009 (EST)
- As far as Pi's sig - yea, sometimes it takes "three lines" of space. But it's good math, and fun to read! How can we complain about that? Also, I think he "randomed down" the fatter versions of his sig. ħuman
22:59, 16 January 2009 (EST)
- As far as Pi's sig - yea, sometimes it takes "three lines" of space. But it's good math, and fun to read! How can we complain about that? Also, I think he "randomed down" the fatter versions of his sig. ħuman
- Agreed on the no protecting. No big deal on the siggy, but I DO beg to differ on the size...TheoryOfPractice 22:54, 16 January 2009 (EST)
- 1. Nopoint in protecting, it's more fun to revert and vandal bin the idiots. 2. Pi's sig is "mostly harmless" - I think only one if really "big", and, for myself, I like the math exercise in reading it. ħuman
- If you want to vent you can write Fun:RationalWikiWiki/Fall down. As for my signature when I first looked at the page your comment looked misplaced. - User
- Makes sense. Your signature is too fucking big, btw. TheoryOfPractice 22:36, 16 January 2009 (EST)
Did I not say "no big deal on the siggy"? Am I talkin' to a fuckin' empty room here or what? Really, no big deal, I was just takin' the piss a little. TheoryOfPractice 23:01, 16 January 2009 (EST)
- So we're all friends still? :) :) :) ħuman
23:05, 16 January 2009 (EST)