Talk:Argument by censorship
Would this be Wikileting or Dewikileting? It seems similar to the Colbert portmanteau Wikiality. --Edgerunner76 14:46, 9 November 2007 (EST)
- I'm starting to think that deleting without first commenting should be an instantly blockable offense - especially if done by an IP.--Bobbing up 15:16, 9 November 2007 (EST)
[edit] Relocate?
If this is a thin veiled crit of CP, should it go in the CP namespace? If not, it needs extending or vapourising. ArmondikoVmoral 06:29, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- It is also a thin veiled attach on a few of a least favourite trolls. Let it stay. - User
06:47, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- It may mention CP, but it really was written to address things that happen here, too. However, perhaps it belongs in the RW space? Is it really a mainspace "article"? ħuman
16:32, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- I think this article doesn't belong in the mainspace. It seems too "meta" to really qualify as a normal article.
Radioactive Misanthrope 16:38, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- How about redirecting to Burning the evidence? Or perhaps Conservapedia:Burning the Evidence? Totnesmartin 16:44, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- I can't think of any better alternatives, so I'll second your suggestion.
Radioactive Misanthrope 16:53, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- I can't think of any better alternatives, so I'll second your suggestion.
- How about redirecting to Burning the evidence? Or perhaps Conservapedia:Burning the Evidence? Totnesmartin 16:44, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- I think this article doesn't belong in the mainspace. It seems too "meta" to really qualify as a normal article.
- It may mention CP, but it really was written to address things that happen here, too. However, perhaps it belongs in the RW space? Is it really a mainspace "article"? ħuman
I'm not sure if this is relevant to the discussion, but Gulik dedicated the article to 12.75.66.206. Perusing the bunchofnumber's edits, it seems to have been a global warming denialist.
Radioactive Misanthrope 16:53, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- I think it should just be moved to the RW namespace. As I said, although it mentions CP, it was written about activities here. ħuman
18:04, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- Sadly, it applies to just about ANY wiki. I don't know where it should go, personally. --Gulik 23:42, 17 February 2009 (EST)
[edit] Rewrite
I've started on a re-write, since I agree that this had become a bit too CP-centric. I think that this topic goes way beyond CP and wikis, so I'm going to add some commentary on techniques used in blogs, forums and sites such as YouTube. --
Ask me about your mother 17:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)