Talk:Dr. Strangelove

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon film.svg

This Films related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png

Sorry[edit]

...for this atrociously short stub. I love the movie, but not as much as other people cream themselves over it. I thought I could at least get it started. -- Seth Peck (talk) 19:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

As Slim Pickens would say[edit]

What the hell is that shit? I think Seth has got sexual issues of his own with his writing "the inability of the bomber crew to "perform" (drop the bomb) after much elaborate foreplay (in-flight build-up)". DeltaStarSenior SysopSpeciationspeed! 23:14, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Eh? ТyBother me 00:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
The entire movie was chock-full of sexual puns. The opening scene has even been suggested as the origin of Rule 34. Osaka Sun (talk)
Glad you know so much about my sexual abilities, DeltaStar, not that I go to great lengths to keep them secret. -- Seth Peck (talk) 15:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
What is 'Rule 34'? 86.146.100.119 (talk) 22:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
If it exists, there's porn of it. Rule 35 is if there isn't porn of it, it will be made, especially if you point out that it's an exception to Rule 34. RoninMacbeth (talk) 02:35, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Two of the most important rules of fanfic then. (And the first derivative is 'some of the adult fanfic is weird, and some weirder than newcomers can imagine - and Arthur C Clark's phrase about the future being queerer than one can imagine reads 'queerer' as 'slashier' rather than the intended 'weirder'). 86.146.100.119 (talk) 13:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)