Talk:End times

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon religion.svg

This Religion related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately.

This article is of MID importance to the wiki.

See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

You will be aware that many people take these beliefs seriously.Tolerance 12:11, 19 April 2008 (EDT)

Hopefully we can enlighten those poor souls and relieve them of unnecessary despair. It's a great shame that people have been psychologically abused into believing such unfounded nonsense in the first place. Jollyfish.gifGenghisOur ignorance is God; what we know is science. 12:31, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
You will be aware that many people take these beliefs seriously... Yes, I am sure they do. And I take my beliefs VERY seriously too - come over for a beer one day and we'll talk about the dialectic - but that doesn't mean I can't appreciate some humour about those beliefs. Lighten up - life's too short. PFoster 12:43, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
It's wonderful! thanks SS. SusanG  ContribsTalk 14:03, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
Yes, but it is serius! We has teh good newz taht Ceiling Cat will finally pwn Basement Cat for all tymez and builded for us to has new Earth and Heavin. It's exciting and I is glad to shar teh Good Nuuz. We must counter teh false gospul of teh Flying Spaghetti Monster with teh pure saving gospul of Ceiling Cat! Secret Squirrel 15:26, 19 April 2008 (EDT)

Wait, what? I always thought Basement Cat is the Antichrist. I has konfjuschon. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 14:07, 19 April 2008 (EDT)

Noooooo! Heresy!!!! Taht is teh heresy of teh LolcatBible-denying liberals! Antichrist is a persun sent by Basement Cat pretending to be Ceiling Cat's son but is not, Basement Cat is teh devil hisself. Not is dey teh same being. Secret Squirrel 15:26, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
Hmm, ok. I'm in ur theolojee, seein' ur point. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 16:04, 19 April 2008 (EDT)

I has 2 point out, u r deviatin frum teh holy werd as it written. Zmidponk 23:41, 19 April 2008 (EDT)

But taht is bekus teh holy werd haz bin transl8d frm teh corrupted Aleksandrin manuskrptz and not frm teh Textus Receptis. Secret Squirrel 06:36, 20 April 2008 (EDT)

Teh funniez[edit]

If anyone is particularly attached to that opening paragraph, please speak now or I will personally kill it and replace it with something that hasn't been written by someone who is too easily impressed by 4Chan memes. Scarlet A.pngsshole 16:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I've been irritated by since I first read it. Totnesmartin 16:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Done, and good riddance! LOL!!!!!!!11112222threefour!!! Scarlet A.pngsshole 17:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Aww darn. Does this mean the Ceiling Cat/Walrus/in ur fridg eating ur cheesburgers thing is finally over? Secret Squirrel 17:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Yes. I've left the one mention in the opening paragraph but an entire description in cheezburger was just too much. Scarlet A.pngsshole

"Seven years of trials and tribulations,[edit]

seven plus one, the prophets tell us. Is this the end, the last year of this peace? Or the beginning?"

The series was so-so, but Lance Henriksen is a great actor. Not to mention Mark Snow's score. -- (talk) 21:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Q & A section[edit]

Wtf, this is lame. ħumanUser talk:Human 08:48, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Soooo... this is very xian.[edit]

Do we really want this to be so xian in the opening? Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 13:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm talking to myself. cool. Anyhow, since we have "eschatology", and end times, maybe we can relocate this to something (but better) like "End times - the christian version". I suck at titles, but someone smarter than me can please think of a nice, straightforward comment? Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 13:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

The European Economic Community[edit]

... had 6/9 members in the 1970s; while EFTA had 7.

No mention of Malachi. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

I think you need to explain what you're on about. I remember the Seventh Day Adventists I used to know saying the EEC was the antichrist (when they weren't pointing fingers at Pope or Henry Kissinger) but you'll need to expand on the details here. SophieWilderModerator 18:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
The section 'The usual American Protestant fundamentalist scenario'

Malachi - the prediction of the Popes. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Malachi's Prophecy of the Popes is a hoax, and isn't about the EEC anyway. SophieWilderModerator 12:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The statement that the EEC (as it then was) had seven members is #wrong, wrong, wrong# - there were either 6 (number of the beast connection) or 9 (then number of the planets, so (resonances/astrology involving then number of planets/associations of number 69/anything else people care to mention) applies. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 18:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
When the EEC had seven members, ti was proof of the Roman Empire revived because of the seven heads of the Beast. Then, when it had ten members, it was still proof, because of the ten crowns. Then it went to thirteen, but it was still going to drop back to ten because shut up, reasons. Now it's 27 and I'm not sure how the evangelicals are spinning it now, because I stopped paying attention. Pere Ubu (talk) 22:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Any time now...[edit]

You use this as sarcasm, however, Peter has warned us about peopel like you.

3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, 3:4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men. 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

All you're doing is fulfilling prophecy by claiming that. — Unsigned, by: 174.25.43.186 / talk / contribs

Since snarky atheists (and snarky other-religion-ists) have been around for the entire 1900 or so years since Peter wrote that, and the world hasn't been enveloped in fire, I like our chances. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 00:14, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
The Lord is not slack? Well, these guys are --> www.subgenius.com PRABOB! Pere Ubu (talk) 21:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)