Talk:Horizon problem

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] FACT

Do we have a discussion of why AiG got basically all their facts wrong about the early universe and don't know what the hell they're talking about? (Apart from the basic "They're AiG, of course they don't know what they're talking about) So far as I can tell, they make the assumption that the early universe must have had random conditions, and therefore the uniformity of the cosmic background is a problem... except that currently basically everyone thinks the universe was almost uniform, so... they're wrong. Yeah. WazzaHello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me... 16:18, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] There is no refutation

In the debate against Nye, Ken Ham used this argument to solve the problem of starlight. This "rebuttal" included in the article seem obsolete. Ken Ham shows that the problem is not resolved and that the facts favor biblical creationism. I think you better be truthful to yourself and say that there is no refutation.

Thank you for your attention.

--201.8.154.188 (talk) 02:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

No thanks. I think we'll be keeping it as is (i.e. truthful and accurate). - Grant (talk) 03:03, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support