Talk:KafirGirl
From RationalWiki
I'm not sure why being an atheist and having a blog makes you worthy of an article. If she is saying great things, or is considered one of the main "go to" out there, than that's fine, but we need to be better about explaining that in the article. As it stands per this article, she is just one of several millions of people who have blogs, happens to be an atheist, and is also of islamic heritage. --
En attendant Godot 14:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Her Alexa ranking is 6,706,900. My next door neighbors' economics blog is around 1,300,000 (rounded off for obvious reasons). Kind of puts in context for me. I vote for deletion. Although, the Steve Wells connection does give it a little mark of distinction --Danfly (talk) 15:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- And she hasn't edited for two and a half years! Delete, delete, delete. Jack Hughes (talk) 15:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- That's three then. --Danfly (talk) 15:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- One thing we can do, with all these bloggers and youtubers is have a single page that lists them, a brief (which is all we have here anyhow) summary, and a link to their blogs. I mean we have this woman, but we don't have Coyne's Why Evo is True. and i'm not even sure i've seen PZ meyer's octo-obsession blog. :-)--
En attendant Godot 15:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- It would be a very long page if we want to include barely notable ones. Should we divide them by site to? For example, an article for wordpress bloggers and an article for blogspot bloggers etc. --Danfly (talk) 15:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- I think that would be a bad way to differentiate the bloggers (by wordpress/blogspot/etc). A single page should do, alphabetized, subsectioned by letter. Aboriginal Noise Theist, barely hanging by a nail 15:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Something like this? P-Foster (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- OK, so if those (really good, in most cases) blogs only get mention on a single list, then all this youtube stuff, and "I know someone who has an atheist leprachaunist blog" really really needs scratching.--
En attendant Godot 15:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- OK, so if those (really good, in most cases) blogs only get mention on a single list, then all this youtube stuff, and "I know someone who has an atheist leprachaunist blog" really really needs scratching.--
- Something like this? P-Foster (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- I think that would be a bad way to differentiate the bloggers (by wordpress/blogspot/etc). A single page should do, alphabetized, subsectioned by letter. Aboriginal Noise Theist, barely hanging by a nail 15:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- It would be a very long page if we want to include barely notable ones. Should we divide them by site to? For example, an article for wordpress bloggers and an article for blogspot bloggers etc. --Danfly (talk) 15:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- One thing we can do, with all these bloggers and youtubers is have a single page that lists them, a brief (which is all we have here anyhow) summary, and a link to their blogs. I mean we have this woman, but we don't have Coyne's Why Evo is True. and i'm not even sure i've seen PZ meyer's octo-obsession blog. :-)--
- That's three then. --Danfly (talk) 15:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- And she hasn't edited for two and a half years! Delete, delete, delete. Jack Hughes (talk) 15:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Looks like I may have overestimated her popularity; I started the article mainly on the back of the Steve Wells connection and the development of the "where'd she go?" fanclub after she vanished. It never got beyond a stub anyway so I'm not too fussed if it's deleted. Baljit (talk) 10:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)