Talk:Kirk Cameron

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon creationism.svg

This Creationism related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Archives for this talk page: , (new)



Preventing trouble[edit]

I put the text below onto this page, it warns editors but doesn't show on the page unless you press the edit button. :-
<!--please don't put any referenced links above the {{raycomfort}} template as the computer can't handle those links. --> Proxima Centauri (talk) 07:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Proxie's revisions[edit]

Proxie's revisions are actually better, here. Claiming someone lied is pretty weak. Claiming they probably lied, and even "if not" they are idiots is far better. --Green mowse.pngGodotQu'un sang impur Abreuve nos sillons 01:05, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

I've put it back into the article and on reflection I agree with Godot that Kirk probably lied. I have studied Ray Comfort and Kirk at length but I've come across no witnesses to Kirk's supposed atheism. I kept the original politer statement that "it's not likely his atheism was well thought out.". Can I do stuff like calling Kirk Cameron an idiot? If I do people like Godot will pounce on me and say that's the wrong language. Proxima Centauri (talk) 08:48, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

"Godot will pounce on me." The Godot cat is a mighty hunter, who likes to torment her prey. Then she bites the heads off and leaves the liver for my mom to find in the morning. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 09:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Just sayin', but 17 is around the age that young misunderstood geniuses usually get a copy of Atlas Shrugged and decide that they're now adherents of John Galt. Or the equivalent. --Pere Ubu (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

This reads like a shit sandwhich[edit]

I'm all for snark, but this article is rank with all sorts of stupid little comments that somebody once thought were "cute," but which, in reality, make this article just seem lame and stupid. Anybody else up for helping me clean it up? The Absent-minded Hero (talk) 09:51, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

just do it. No need to get sanctimonious about it. Acei9 09:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I sometimes forget that I have the power to do things other than forget. The Absent-minded Hero (talk) 09:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Is there a term[edit]

for fake ex-atheists?--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ ∈)☼(∋ 12:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, there is. It's "fake ex-atheists".The Krusty Krab (talk) 22:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
You're responding to a post from 2015. Carthage (talk) 22:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Saving Christmas quote[edit]

Is there an actual quote from Cameron saying the backlash from the movie is part of an atheist conspiracy? Because I can't find it.—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 03:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)