Talk:Large Hadron Collider

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

"It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine." Sterilesnore! 08:14, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

Probably because you missed all the black holes and the sky-on-fire bit. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 08:21, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
Boring! End of the world is ok, as long as it is at least as spectacular as Hollywood flicks. Editor at CPLiar at RP! 08:23, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
You can check up on things on "Has the Large Hadron Collider Destroyed the World Yet (dotcom)"
Times Online has a list of 30 Apocalypses that never were. I liked number 29:
Friday 13th April 2007: An un-named punter placed a £10 best at 10,000/1 with Ladbrokes, the bookmakers, that the world would end on that day. It is unclear how he expected to collect.
Redchuck.gif ГенгисRationalWiki GOLD member 11:05, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

We ought to find an awesome image or two for this article. ħumanUser talk:Human 20:38, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

Check this one Human. Ace McWickedThis Talk Page is growing rapidly 20:42, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

Nice! What's the html around it so I can check the copyright status (most of these are free anyway, I just want to make sure)? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:56, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
Here's the site have gander. Ace McWickedThis Talk Page is growing rapidly 21:00, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
Thanks! ħumanUser talk:Human 21:34, 15 September 2008 (EDT) is teh better. ħumanUser talk:Human 21:40, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
OK, I'm digging all over the CERN site for that picture, can't find it. I do know now that it's the ATLAS thingie, and those eight pipe looking objects are toroidal magnets. This thing is one of the detectors, I guess. At this point I think having a link to CERN is good enough... ħumanUser talk:Human 22:05, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
Got it! [1] so how big do we want our copy to be? ħumanUser talk:Human 22:08, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

I take it you have all seen The Large Hadron Collider Rap? Most educational! DogP 21:44, 15 September 2008 (EDT)


[edit] 80,000 computers

The article ref'd is inconsistent - it says there are 80k pcs at LHC HQ alone, so are the rest a bit like the SETI @ Home project? IE, no one really knows how many people are joining in yet? 22:37, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

It's something like that. I cant remember from the top of my head but I dont think there is an @home version. Its spread throught uni's and labs round the world Ace McWickedThis Talk Page is growing rapidly 22:38, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
They should make an @home version! We could all help get the silly bosonating done so they can get to work cooking steaks for us. ħumanUser talk:Human 22:50, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Not quite woo

More twisted SF - the 'explanation' that the LHC was failing repeatedly was because it-in-the-future was going back in time to prevent itself becoming operational. (talk) 15:34, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Same thing, really. Scarlet A.pngbomination 16:07, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

As it is an example of the 'killing your grandfather paradox' there is a putative SF component. (talk) 16:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright, CERN

Quite concerned we have two copyrighted images proudly displaying their status there. Yes, they're the iconic shots of ATLAS but not even Wikipedia gets to use them. Scarlet A.pngmoral 14:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

[edit] See also: Comic sans.

I don't get it. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.Moderator 18:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Personal tools