Talk:Law enforcement
Contents |
[edit] Move to fun
I think there is no way this belongs in the mainspace. Unless there are any objections, I'm going to move it and then create a mainspace article on this topic. Tetronian you're clueless 17:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, fun it up. Aboriginal Noise Theist, barely hanging by a nail 17:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Better yet, just rewrite it from scratch. No need for a separate "fun" article. Secret Squirrel 17:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Not very good article. If teh CP-centric part was removed there'd be nothing. ħuman
04:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not very good article. If teh CP-centric part was removed there'd be nothing. ħuman
- Better yet, just rewrite it from scratch. No need for a separate "fun" article. Secret Squirrel 17:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion.
Nothing to this. AceX-102 22:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- Mmm ... whacker is the closest we come to missionality on the general subject - David Gerard (talk) 23:08, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Potential resource
Posted by Toast at the SB, copied here for posteriority and usefulness. ħuman
02:59, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
[edit] This article desperately needs improvement
As the name of the topic suggests, this article (at the time of this posting) is in desperate need of improvement. It is little more than a complaint that law enforcement can be perverted by the power hungry (which never happens with any of the other systems humanity has created). Furthermore, it doesn't even contain any snark (or humor of any kind, as far as I can tell). Is anyone working on this, or should I add it to my project list? - Gameboy (talk) 20:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)