Talk:Negative evidence
From RationalWiki
Possible topics for discussion (--Sethpeck (talk) 21:09, 9 November 2011 (UTC)):
- Evidence of absense vs. absense of evidence (WMDs, Donald Rumsfeld, Gin Rummy)
- Phlogiston, Aether
- Dark Matter
- Obvious atheistic viewpoints
- I'm shocked AD wrote this, but I need to ask "can you rewrite it so it makes sense to those of us not used to dealing with logical terms?" I read it twice, and walked away not having a clue what "negative evidence" is. Is it just a lack of evidence, and if so, why does it have its own name. Thanks in advance.
GodotI smell roasted chestnuts. droollllllll. 21:27, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, it's stubby and I meant to come back to it. It's not very good, I admit. I vow to fix it.--
talk
22:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- It's not the stubbyness. jsut the fact that I walked away not having a clue what i wrote. which is really unusual for me, when reading your work.
GodotI smell roasted chestnuts. droollllllll. 22:22, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- I just slapped something out. I'll fix it! I swear!--
talk
22:44, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- I just slapped something out. I'll fix it! I swear!--
- It's not the stubbyness. jsut the fact that I walked away not having a clue what i wrote. which is really unusual for me, when reading your work.
- Sorry, it's stubby and I meant to come back to it. It's not very good, I admit. I vow to fix it.--