Talk:Pensacola Christian College
From RationalWiki
Any chance someone actually has this book and can vouch for the quoted text? Can't find a free online version. Strange, you'd think true Christians would want to spread their theology to everyone with their only reward being the knowledge of saving someone's immortal soul...
“”Bible Doctrines for Today - a Bible course text that may also double as bad science fiction. An excerpt: "Some have suggested that as Christ returns, the New Jerusalem, a satellite space city, begins its descent toward the earth (Rev.21:1-2). This event has not gone unnoticed by the sophisticated tracking devices of the world. The armies of the world therefore pinpoint its destination as Jerusalem and gather there to do battle against what they interpret as invaders from outer space."
|
ThunderkatzHo! 00:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
I can vouch for it. I still own that particular book.70.171.14.182 (talk) 17:23, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- I can vouch for most of the content of the article. I read the student handbook that was leaked by The Student Voice, and it seems that Pensacola's policies even forbid men and women from looking each other too deeply in the eye (a.k.a., "making eye babies"). I cannot vouch for what is said of Science: Order & Reality or Bible Doctrines for Today.
ListenerXTalkerX 04:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm just concerned that Student Voice isn't really a primary source. It should be clear in the article that the info is from a document leaked by that website - it may sound a little Wikipedian or pedantic, but it's also intellectual honesty. The articles of faith may suggest some things in the usual way that they do, and would be useful to look into as it is a primary source. It shows they're as God-bothering as they come, although seem to be quite silent on the rules appearing in the leaked handbook.
moral 15:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm just concerned that Student Voice isn't really a primary source. It should be clear in the article that the info is from a document leaked by that website - it may sound a little Wikipedian or pedantic, but it's also intellectual honesty. The articles of faith may suggest some things in the usual way that they do, and would be useful to look into as it is a primary source. It shows they're as God-bothering as they come, although seem to be quite silent on the rules appearing in the leaked handbook.
I added a new section called "degrees offered". I went on the PCC website and I resisted laughing when their site mentioned "Natural Science" degree's--Rationalzombie94 (talk) 17:32, 30 April 2014 (UTC)