Talk:Philosophy
Come on guys, let's be serious here, Philosophy is not nonsense, it's the study of "salvation" (in fact, we are talking of "wisdom") without the need to believe in God. In fact, the introduction of the RationalWiki entry "RationalWiki Atheism FAQ for the Newly Deconverted" is mainly a phiolosiphical article! I think modern rationalism, and it's acceptance by a relatively high number of individuals, owes a lot to philosophers.— Unsigned, by: Roberto.sallier / talk / contribs
- Philosophy', although considered by some as a purely mental exercise bordering on nonsense, is the study of "salvation" (in fact, we are talking of "wisdom") without the need to believe in God. It is interesting to notice that the introduction of the RationalWiki entry "RationalWiki Atheism FAQ for the Newly Deconverted" is mainly a philosiphical article. I think modern rationalism, and it's acceptance by a relatively high number of individuals, owes a lot to philosophers. --Roberto.sallier (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll bite. What is this actually supposed to mean:
- Philosophy', although considered by some as a purely mental exercise bordering on nonsense, is the study of "salvation" (in fact, we are talking of "wisdom") without the need to believe in God."
- I've read it several times and I'm not much wiser. Any suggestions?--BobSpring is sprung! 17:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's the ancient Greek idea that philosophy was a form of personal development - the Socratic quotes "know thyself2 and 2the unexamined life is not worth living" spring to mind. this, however, completely disregards the later idea of philosophy as a means of explaining the universe and its doings. Totnesmartin (talk) 17:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- It's just that when I look up "salvation" I don't find a meaning which equates it with "wisdom".--BobSpring is sprung! 17:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Me neither. Enlightenment would be closer. Totnesmartin (talk) 18:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- It's just that when I look up "salvation" I don't find a meaning which equates it with "wisdom".--BobSpring is sprung! 17:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's the ancient Greek idea that philosophy was a form of personal development - the Socratic quotes "know thyself2 and 2the unexamined life is not worth living" spring to mind. this, however, completely disregards the later idea of philosophy as a means of explaining the universe and its doings. Totnesmartin (talk) 17:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll bite. What is this actually supposed to mean:
[edit] Quotation
Philosophy is to the real world as masturbation is to sex. Karl Marx 82.44.143.26 (talk) 17:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- [citation needed] Also, if you want to do something, get an account and write some articles instead of splashing pseudowit all over the talk pages.--ZooGuard (talk) 19:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Descriptive/normative ??
- "Much of Western philosophy... identifies as analytic (going from the smallest to the largest), descriptive/normative and objective."
So, is it either descriptive or normative, but not both? Does "Western philosophy" identify as having a major axis from descriptive to normative? Did whoever wrote that think "normative" and "descriptive" mean similar things? More clarity, less turbidity, please. FWIW, here is where it got put into the article. I'd fix it myself, but it's too compact and opaquely coded for me to parse. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 14:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
[edit] Nomenclature
If sciences are "natural philosophy", does that mean philosophy is "unnatural science"? I would so go into a field named "unnatural science"! CorruptUser (talk) 22:37, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hellz yes. FuzzyCatTomato (talk/stalk) 22:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC)