Talk:Pseudonym

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Can we have some discussions of different reasons for being pseudonymous, especially with regards to bloggers, the conservative practice of "outing" pseudonymous bloggers in fits of pique over them proving the out-er wrong, and a connection to Conservapedia's policy on names? I would do it, but I am too lazy. WazzaHello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me... 12:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Go for it. SJ Debaser 13:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
I think you are misunderstanding the essential nature of "lazy". WazzaHello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me... 06:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Does it mean cake? So your last sentence "I would do it, but I am too cake," meaning you were eating cake but now free. I don't really know how you'd go about starting a discussion, however. SJ Debaser 09:54, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Discussions also mean "talking about things" in, for instance, an article, as opposed to not having anything on it. WazzaHello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me... 11:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

A general list of pseudonym examples, as this is now, could be potentially endless & doesn't seem very useful. I suggest we replace this with an article on the phenomenon of pseudonyms & reasons for them, + cut the examples, or at least pare them down to people related to the site missions. WěǎšěǐǒǐďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 23:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support