Talk:Q gospel
From RationalWiki
This is a really bad redirect from "Q". "Q Gospel" I could get behind, but to hijack a single letter for such a trivial, single topic??? ħuman
05:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- This is a really bad place to stick this objection. Why you got to be ragging on an innocent article about an important topic in biblical criticism? WazzaHello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me... 06:09, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm cool with this article, just not with "Q" being a redirect to it. ħuman
06:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm cool with this article, just not with "Q" being a redirect to it. ħuman
[edit] Fun stuff
I think someone should make a fun version of this subject, saying that it's a gospel focusing on Q from Star Trek. — Unsigned, by: 71.7.245.53 / talk / contribs
- How about saying it's the Gospel of Avenue Q? Zack Martin
22:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Citation needed
" An alternative suggestion is that Matthew was written after Luke, or Luke was written after Matthew, and the later work borrowed phrasings from both the earlier and Mark." - sez who? SophieWilder 12:42, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- more importantly, what the fuck does it mean?
Godot She was a venus demilo in her sister's jeans 16:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)