Talk:Q gospel

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This is a really bad redirect from "Q". "Q Gospel" I could get behind, but to hijack a single letter for such a trivial, single topic??? ħumanUser talk:Human 05:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a really bad place to stick this objection. Why you got to be ragging on an innocent article about an important topic in biblical criticism? WazzaHello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me... 06:09, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm cool with this article, just not with "Q" being a redirect to it. ħumanUser talk:Human 06:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Fun stuff

I think someone should make a fun version of this subject, saying that it's a gospel focusing on Q from Star Trek. — Unsigned, by: 71.7.245.53 / talk / contribs

How about saying it's the Gospel of Avenue Q? Zack Martin HolyMaratreanSigil.png 22:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Citation needed

" An alternative suggestion is that Matthew was written after Luke, or Luke was written after Matthew, and the later work borrowed phrasings from both the earlier and Mark." - sez who? SophieWilder 12:42, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

more importantly, what the fuck does it mean? Green mowse.pngGodot She was a venus demilo in her sister's jeans 16:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support