Talk:Race
[edit] Note Well
This article is written by neo-Lysenkoist Communist liars and should not be taken seriously. 121.67.121.41 (talk) 19:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
[edit] What does this mean?
""Race" — in the sense of ancestry — is still used when assessing suitability for bone marrow transplants and other medical purposes, however, thanks to the prevalence of the concept among the larger populace."
Are you saying the human body rejects tissue from other races because of an "imaginary belief" in the validity of race? 121.67.68.227 (talk) 16:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
[edit] Question
| Spill over from another site | |
|---|---|
|
"(cur | prev) 15:58, 26 August 2014 Ikanreed(Talk | contribs) . . (-326) . . (Yeah, okay, your pretending evolution means X doesn't mean evolution means X. Go away, you are boring.) (undo)" "Ikanreed" wrote the above as a reason to revert me. I posit with full sincerity that the above is total nonsense. Could "Ikanreed" explain him/herself? 211.169.83.62 (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Note that all the IP's above are more socks of the mentally ill liar/troll Mikemikev:
And lol @ calling someone else as having a facial deformity in the fossil record page chat when you look like this:
If you note above, on another sock IP, Mikemikev posted the below in 2013. I'll highlight the "Caucasoid" skeletal traits in question from his posted box. TRAIT: CAUCASOID, NEGROID, MONGOLOID cranial index* "75 to 80, mesocranic", "less than 75, dolichocranic", "greater than 80, brachycranic" sagittal contour* arched, flat with bregmatic or post-bregmatic depression, arched keeling of skull vault* absent present absent total facial index* "greater than 90," "less than 85, " "85 to 90, " narrow to very narrow broad to very broad medium or average facial profile* "orthognathic (straight, flat)" "prognathic (projecting), especially in the alveolar area" intermediate to mostly orthognathic nuchal ridge profile* pinched and prominent, slightly pinched, rounded base chord* long long short suture pattern* simple, simple, complex, metopic suture* present absent absent Wormian bones* absent absent Present eye orbit shape* angular and sloping square or rectangle rounded and non-sloping lower eye border receding receding projecting nasal index* "less than 48, leptorrhinic (narrow)" "greater than 53, platyrrhinic (wide)" "48 to 53, mesorrhinic (intermediate)" nasal cavity shape tear shaped rounded and wide oval shaped nasal bones """tower shaped,"" narrow and parallel from anterior, slightly arched in profile" """Quonset hut shaped,"" wide and expanding from anterior, no arch in profile" """tented,"" narrow and expanding from anterior, arched in profile" nasal overgrowth absent absent present nasal sill or dam present absent absent lower nasal spine large and sharp small small zygomatic arches narrow and retreating, medium to large and retreating, projecting external auditory meati round round oval oval window palate shape triangular rectangular parabolic or horseshoe shaped palate suture irregular irregular straight occlusion* slight overbite slight overbite edge-to-edge or even central incisors* blade shaped, blade shaped, shovel shaped ascending ramus of mandible* pinched at midsection back slanted wide and vertical gonial angle* slightly flared not flared slightly flared chin profile* prominent and projecting rounded slightly projecting Now look at Mikemikev: He possesses virtually none (!) of the "Caucasoid" traits highlighted [at least those that can be determined unequivocally without having to measure the skull]. His nose you can see is certainly not narrow, and is very wide, "negroid"-looking, also failing the other "Caucasoid" nasal criteria; he also has alveolar prognathism and a poorly developed chin, again "negroid". He's also long-headed. Most his traits such as these match the "negroid" category from the above list. What a complete dumbass. Windir (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
https://encyclopediadramatica.es/Mikemikev You also posted this: "if genetic similarity is measured over many thousands of loci, the answer becomes “never” when individuals are sampled from geographically separated populations", which is false:
So will you admit you just lied (again)? Two 'white' men (Watson and Venter) are closer genetically to a Korean than to each other. And that's their whole genomes tested dumbass, not a tiny fraction of their genotype which is the crap genetic studies you usually post.Windir (talk) 19:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
|